THE SENATE UNANIMOUSLY passed a bipartisan bill to provide recourse to victims of porn deepfakes — or sexually-explicit, non-consensual images created with artificial intelligence.

The legislation, called the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act — passed in Congress’ upper chamber on Tuesday.  The legislation has been led by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), as well as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in the House.

The legislation would amend the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to allow people to sue those who produce, distribute, or receive the deepfake pornography, if they “knew or recklessly disregarded” the fact that the victim did not consent to those images.

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    —It’s not a Libertarian thing to me as much as it’s a ‘politicians don’t understand firearms thing.’

    —It’s not a Libertarian thing to me as much as it’s a ‘politicians don’t understand healthcare thing.’

    —It’s not a Libertarian thing to me as much as it’s a ‘politicians don’t understand medical thing.’

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      🎯

      This kind of argument is always just a thought-terminator. No actual argument for why the law is bad, just a low-effort jab that lawmakers are too stupid to pass a good law.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s okay, I’m pretty sure they are simply showing that Libertarian ideology is based in a mistrust of politicians — and to a degree, they’re right. I don’t typically promote or discuss the ideology. I just think as I currently watch YouTube videos on the nuances of cybersecurity, that it’s so easy for well-informed professional experts to make far reaching mistakes, that it seems absurd to expect uneducated politicians to create regulations that are simultaneously targeted enough to not cause excess issues while still broad enough to effectively reduce the unwanted behavior.

        I still think back to Clinton arguing that regulating the internet was akin to “nailing jello to the wall.”

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I still think back to Clinton arguing that regulating the internet was akin to “nailing jello to the wall.”

          But the internet is extremely well regulated, thanks to organizations like ICANN & IANA whose entire existence is the result of a U.S. Department of Commerce contract to properly regulate names, addresses, and routing tables. Failure to obey the rules will get your peering agreements terminated, and sever you from the Internet. Failure to cut off rule violators can get you in trouble.

          It’s what makes sure ISPs don’t break the Internet doing arbitrary shit, and keeps shady groups from improperly routing internet traffic through their datacenters without consequences.

          I think just revisiting the point that politicians aren’t going to be exact when talking about highly technical things like this, and that Clinton very likely meant “The Web” and not “The Internet”.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Because I don’t want to take the time going through every legislative framework I just listed to cite the shitpile of mistakes and revisions or because youve never read the pile of redacted and revised subparagraphs found in every single regulatory legislation? The fact you think it’s that simple to compile proof shows you have never read any actual legislative documents. If you want proof, ill list off the top of my head the shit NYS fucked up because Ive read them some what recently:

        SAFE Act:

        -Original framework had no ban on high capacity magazines because they thought magazines were disposable and as long as they banned the sale the existing HCM’s would be phased out.

        -Required AR registration with no system to enforce it, then continued to deny all FOIL requests and judicial requests of the number of registered AR’s because the turnout was so dismal.

        -Issues red flag laws that have no method of enforcement or way of including when a person is a red flag offender on the background check performed at point of sale.

        -Added the requirement for pistol permit applicants to have range training but never amended the part of the law that bans anyone from using a pistol without being approved for a pistol permit.

        -They couldn’t appropriately define imminent danger and had the state supreme court overturn the regulation entirely

        Recreational Marijuana: seriously just fuckin google this one. It’s so embarrassing how bad they botched the entire thing.

        -NYS had millions of dollars of marijuana crops with nowhere to go because they released tons of farming licenses and barely any dispensary licenses.

        honestly I’m not taking the time to list all of these. Google it and you will see resounding incompetence.