• PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’re thinking of “would.” “Should” just means it’s probable. You know, like “usually.”

    You’re projecting

    Again, I’m using context and experience to infer your opinion. Naturally it’s bound to be biased, it is my experience, but it’s the best I can do with nothing but your condescending whinging to go on.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re thinking of “would.” “Should” just means it’s probable. You know, like “usually.”

      Fair enough, I stand corrected.

      Again, I’m using context and experience to infer your opinion.

      Well, hopefully going forward your experience will now help guide you to what should have been obvious the whole time: there was precisely zero context that indicated I thought that.

      condescending whinging to go on.

      Lol imagine with starting this whole thing by condescendingly telling the poster that because they find it boring it should be easier…and then turning around and whining that you completely fabricated a strawman because someone else was condescending.

      It never cease to amaze me how often other posters see themselves in me, and seem to hate it.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Now that sounds like projection if I’ve ever heard it. I love myself! You don’t suppose anyone ever sees you in you and doesn’t like what they see, do you?

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, certainly people see me in and me and don’t like it. I’m sure even you do. But your post here amounts to nothing more than “I know you are but what am I” and so it’s pretty clear you also see yourself and don’t like it.

          But don’t worry, I don’t expect you to admit it. Ffs, you even created a strawman and then blame me for you doing it. It’s obvious you will go far to protect your ego from admitting fault.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              At what point did I accuse you of avoiding questions? You doing okay over there?

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                See, this response, like your others, shows a definite lack of contextual reasoning. You never accused me of avoiding anything and the fact that you think I think you did (apart from being obvious projection) shows you have misunderstood everything I’ve said on a fundamental level. So again, I’m sorry you don’t like the answers to your questions, but I don’t have any different answers to give you.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Oh, sorry. I didn’t realize you had gone all the way back to the beginning of this and had abandoned the fact that you keep projecting onto me.

                  It had nothing to do with me not liking your answer, but pointing out the glaring logical flaws of it. But I don’t have any different response to logically fallacious arguments.

                  • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    So the “glaring logical flaw” in me suggesting that Olympic shooting must be easier than whatever other form of competitive shooting op was talking about because it’s “boring as hell” was that I was projecting my opinion onto you? Even though you weren’t part of the discussion yet? Huh?