• cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    The 100mb/sec are becoming a bottleneck for some use cases, but the capacity is awesome.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even the 100MB/sec won’t work for long as these stupidly small MicroSDs tend to heat up A LOT and then go into throttling where the transfer rate goes down to <1MB/sec.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      That and anecdotally, these high capacity SD cards seem to quickly reach the temperature of the sun during any kind of sustained large file transfer

    • Lucy :3@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d say it’s perfect for security cams or any cams using compression. You could store 14 days of 5120x3200, 60 fps, H.256 HEVC video. Or ~1 day of that at 850 fps.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        even just for my phone it’s not like i’m constantly transferring data to storage, i don’t care if it takes a couple seconds to save a video

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      For a brief moment in my life I worked as data manager in a movie set, and remember studying for that job and having to talk with the DP and the cameraman about memory cards, recorders and checking with them that the quality output of the camera were not bigger that the speed capacity of the memory cards. It was fun times, and sometimes I wonder how my life would be now if I never left Argentina and had accepted the next gig the movie producer called me for.

  • heluecht@pirati.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    @schizoidman AliExpress already has got 2TB SD cards for 5 dollars, I guess soon you will be able to buy 4 TB from there for the same price as well 😁

    (Never ever buy them from there!)

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    The first USB stick I bought, I saved up for and it was over $1/MB. It still works to this day but is so ridiculously slow and capacity limited there’s no reason to.

    4TB in a little stamp is amazing.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I remember bringing a 64M USB drive to school and telling the librarians that “this is the future”

      I think back then you needed to install drivers, so I was trying to get them to install drivers on all the library computers so that it would “just work” for students. Before then we used to have to burn files onto CDs or DVDs to bring them to school.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tiger Direct had a 1GB card in 2002 and it was $900. Blew my money in a 128MB card and lost it. Heart broken.

    • abcdqfr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hopefully the lifespan scales with the amount of writable space. Would be even cooler if that factor was improving over time. Any studies or articles on the topic?

      • Lemongrab
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe inversely because of the increased heat of the tightly packed components.

    • abcdqfr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That does make me wonder how sd cards and ssd compare in terms of volume/tbw endurance. Does silicon have a typical lifespan per volume?

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lifespan per NAND cell, which gets exponentially smaller with each extra ‘layer’ per cell. SLC can do billions of writes per cell, QLC is ~1000 writes per cell.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you look at the petapixel article, they complain about the speed (10mb/sec not 100) and have serious doubts about the reliability. Using this for backup or for security cameras sounds like a bad idea. It could still be good for some things like carrying your movie library on your phone, while still having a stable copy at home.