Book Club

𝜯𝐞𝐡 𝜝𝐚𝐦𝐬𝐤𝐢@lemmy.world · 2 年前

index@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前

Removed by mod

Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world · 2 年前

You can’t have a serious discussion with a person who follows a millennia old book

index@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前

Removed by mod

null@slrpnk.net · 2 年前

Studied*

Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world · 2 年前

Lol spelling errors aren’t a great way to try and play smart

slickgoat@lemmy.world · 2 年前

Oh, and that’s what the other side is pursuing - a serious discussion?

Spare us. The other side is out for blood. No discussion is detailed in Project 2025.

index@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前

Removed by mod

null@slrpnk.net · 2 年前

Yes.

slickgoat@lemmy.world · 2 年前

Is US politics not related to this post? I mean, in any way?

irreticent@lemmy.world · 2 年前

Then why did you do it?

index@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前

Removed by mod

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 2 年前

If we swap the word “bible” for “lawbook” does your opinion change?

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 2 年前

If we had it all active laws in one book, that would be a huge step in the right direction.

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 2 年前

Agreed. “Ignorance of the law is not an excuse” is currently impossible to correct.

otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 年前

Ironic. 🤣🖕🏽