LMAO

  • @BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8711 months ago

    I’d argue that the initial sign up week people should not be classified as “daily active users” Lots of people will check something out when it launches, I’d only start measuring actual usage after a month or two.

    • stoiclime
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      And 80 percent of over 100 million users is still 20-30m active users.

        • stoiclime
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          The article says 80 percent of the users left. If you had more context, you would have got what I said.

    • @empireOfLoveOP
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      Yeah. Really those “DAU” numbers should be rolling average numbers per month, because there’s far too much user variability even week to week for any data to be reliable.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4711 months ago

    Threads is on track to earn the title of “most actively dropped social network”.

  • Chemical Wonka
    link
    fedilink
    37
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Any downfall of Meta (former Facebook ) is a victory for FOSS community, internet and mankind as a whole. One of the heads of the Hydra Big Tech.

  • alternative_factor
    link
    fedilink
    2211 months ago

    I signed up to it from instagram to track my favorite epidemiologists and h5n1 only to discover it has no hashtag system to look up trending topics and most of my favorite epidemiologists aren’t even on it. So it’s worthless for even following COVID, avian flu, and probably every other news topic.

      • alternative_factor
        link
        fedilink
        1411 months ago

        Ah well that would be why it’s completely pointless to me. Since all science is politicized now, I guess there is no reason to use it.

    • @empireOfLoveOP
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      Being attached to Instagram is really the only reason it took off imo. Of course all the normal Insta users are going to at least try it out because it’s so “easy” to sign up.

  • @SubPrimeBadger@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2211 months ago

    I’m torn on this one. I want users to migrate to FOSS platforms but at the same time Threads is the best near term solution to drain Twitter users. In a perfect world, I would like the skinheads to stay on Twitter, the attention seeking people to go to threads, and the normal folk to hit Lemmy/Kbin.

    • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Normal folk to hit Lemmy

      The “normal folk” are the lowest common denominators that turn a fun, hobbiest-centric platform into what Reddit and Facebook and Twitter have become.

      Give me the freaks and geeks instead; they’re the cooler, wiser, less hate-filled people.

    • wagoner
      link
      fedilink
      711 months ago

      At least for me, micro blogging serves very different needs than forums. I don’t see them as so interchangeable that Twitter people flock to kbin/Lemmy.

      • @mbryson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        Isn’t mastodon the federated microblogging replacement? Lemmy & kbin are the forum/news aggregator replacement instead, correct?

        • @empireOfLoveOP
          link
          English
          311 months ago

          That’s meant to be the use case, yeah. Threads kind of wanted to be a bit of both, and of course ended up sucking at both…

      • @Zapp@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Yeah. Google needs to get in there with another product that they will leave in Beta until they cancel it in 18 months.

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    must be sort of a wake up for all of the platform owners to see the user base be so fluid like that… like any of them could get flushed down a toilet at any moment…