calm.like.a.bomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 年前PSA: Intel Graphics Drivers Now Collect Telemetry By Defaultwww.techpowerup.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1281file-textcross-posted to: tech@pawb.socialprivacy@monero.townhardware@lemmy.mlprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1281external-linkPSA: Intel Graphics Drivers Now Collect Telemetry By Defaultwww.techpowerup.comcalm.like.a.bomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 年前message-square48fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: tech@pawb.socialprivacy@monero.townhardware@lemmy.mlprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareKoboldCoterie@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up69·2 年前This shit should be illegal. Or, specifically, should be required to be opt-in only. Data is a commodity, and has been for a long time. Collecting / using users’ data without their express consent should not be as accepted as it is.
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 年前Isn’t that what the GDPR says?
minus-squarekoper@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-22 年前It’s what the ePrivacy directive says, yes. But some get around this by claiming that it’s necessary for the operation of the device/service (doubtful) or that it has limited effect on privacy (depends on exceptions created by member states)
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 年前 Or, specifically, should be required to be opt-in only. Yes, in the same way that folks should be allowed to sell themselves into slavery. Oh wait. (In other words, some things are so inherently exploitative they should be prohibited even with “consent.”)
This shit should be illegal. Or, specifically, should be required to be opt-in only.
Data is a commodity, and has been for a long time. Collecting / using users’ data without their express consent should not be as accepted as it is.
Isn’t that what the GDPR says?
It’s what the ePrivacy directive says, yes. But some get around this by claiming that it’s necessary for the operation of the device/service (doubtful) or that it has limited effect on privacy (depends on exceptions created by member states)
Yes, in the same way that folks should be allowed to sell themselves into slavery.
Oh wait.
(In other words, some things are so inherently exploitative they should be prohibited even with “consent.”)