SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 year agoIf one innocent person is tortured so that everyone else can live and the world doesn't end, is that simultaneously unfair but also morally preferable over complete destruction of everything?message-squaremessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1100
arrow-up1100message-squareIf one innocent person is tortured so that everyone else can live and the world doesn't end, is that simultaneously unfair but also morally preferable over complete destruction of everything?SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square100fedilink
minus-squareLetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up6·1 year agoHaha, innocent. He doesn’t really fit the description.
minus-squareRojoSanIchiban@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoHe’s technically “innocent” of millions of deaths caused by his decades of misinformation.
minus-squareLetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up1·1 year agoI’m still fine with sacrificing him. Volcano, vultures, doesn’t really matter. Some kicks to the balls won’t do harm as well. He needs to be removed from society.
minus-squareDoomBot5@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoCan we torture 10 deserving people instead of 1 innocent?
Is that person Rupert Murdoch? Then yes
Haha, innocent. He doesn’t really fit the description.
He’s technically “innocent” of millions of deaths caused by his decades of misinformation.
Shit you’re right
I’m still fine with sacrificing him. Volcano, vultures, doesn’t really matter. Some kicks to the balls won’t do harm as well. He needs to be removed from society.
Can we torture 10 deserving people instead of 1 innocent?