MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square381fedilinkarrow-up1740
arrow-up1740external-linkLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.comMicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square381fedilink
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·1 year agoWhat does this have to do with anything that is being discussed in the article?
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·1 year agoCan’t tell if bot or posting to the wrong thread…
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoPlease expand because the article is about “protest votes” and the top level comment I responded to is seemingly about how the doctor who wrote it should have earned less money. It seems completely non sequitur.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoI think they’re talking about the comment you responded to. At least, I hope they are.
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoYeah, sorry about that. I did mean the one you were responding to.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoNo worries. It was obvious in retrospect
What does this have to do with anything that is being discussed in the article?
Can’t tell if bot or posting to the wrong thread…
Please expand because the article is about “protest votes” and the top level comment I responded to is seemingly about how the doctor who wrote it should have earned less money. It seems completely non sequitur.
I think they’re talking about the comment you responded to.
At least, I hope they are.
Oh that would make more sense.
Yeah, sorry about that. I did mean the one you were responding to.
No worries. It was obvious in retrospect
deleted by creator