• daq@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nonsense argument. It is much easier to forge or steal a paper copy of a document that it is to do so with an equally well protected digital copy.

    Vast majority of digital theft is done via social engineering and not through some exploit in the underlying technology.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If the local county records get broken into and every property deed gets stolen, the theif doesn’t have ownership of every property in the county. Anything that represents physical ownership of an item is way more secure with a physical paper trial than a digital one. I understand that cryptocurrencies are different than cryptography, but a physical copy of a record i own and an official copy that a relevant party owns, such as a local government, hospital, or bank will always be more secure than digital tokens of ownership.

      • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s just demonstrably false. Lots of historical precedent for people losing property, access, etc due to lost or incorrectly filed documents, clerical errors, corruption and a billion other ways. None of this really affects digital assets.