• witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Isn’t there space for both? Why not try multiple avenues? Why have this negative view on everything? Wouldn’t you say the airplane and the car have tremendously improved humanity, even with all its downsides? Or the cellphone?

    I bet at the time of their inventions you would be opposing it because “billionaires are bad and this industry is going to explore the working class”. Guess what? Yes billionaires are bad and explore people and you (all of us) should be fighting against that, not against scientific and engineering inovation.

    • frauddogg [null/void, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Isn’t there space for both?

      No. Flatly. You do not get to eject any more human garbage into the cosmos from which we came-- you already have WHOLE FUCKING ARRAYS of busted up satellites and pieces of rockets and a bunch of other more shit floating in high orbit that you have no plans to go retrieve, mind you; fuck would you propose making even more for? Other than the narcissistic techbro flex, I mean?

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Every industry exploits the working class under capitalism.

      Are we colonizing planets or building habitats in space right now or any time in the perceivable future, though? No, so beyond a fun thought experiment or sci-fi material, it’s not an idea worth giving any serious thought towards.

      • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Right because innovation materializes itself when we want … We just flicked our fingers and airplane, cellphone and others just appeared.

        Who are you to tell what we should or should not pursue?