• sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s good because then they can’t fire you for lying about it in the interview.

      But good luck telling them they can’t ask that.

      Later: “You weren’t a good fit”

      • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        “we didn’t pass you up because you refused to answer our question about unions, we passed you up because we didn’t like you anymore after you refused to answer our question about unions”

        Use this one simple trick to be a massive piece of shit

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can only speak for the UK, but it is absolutely illegal here for an employer to bring up unionism during a job interview.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, but how on earth would that be enforced?

        “They brought up unions.”

        “No we didn’t.”

        Case closed boys, no evidence.

        Later:

        “We don’t find you a good fit here for unrelated reasons.”

        Even if it is somehow enforced, employer get slapped with a 500-1000£ tickle fine and says “oh no, anyways” before doing the exact same thing.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know it’s a tough thing to enforce.

          The last job interview I had they bought it up. Not even maliciously, the interviewer was just naïve and the work place is actually strongly unionised.

    • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve just this year changed jobs after decades in the same job. I wanted to ask in the interview if they have a Unionised shop floor but the company was American owned (in the UK) so I thought it best to just wonder instead of asking.

      Now I’m contracted to the Company instead of an Agency and know there is actually a Union and it’s the same one I’m a member of, which is nice. So i had a word with the Rep and got them to tell the Union I’m working there.

      Then this week I was in my first Union meeting at this company and was a little confused why the manager that interviewed me AND HIS MANAGER were in the meeting. I thought perhaps they were just there talking to the Union to see what they thought on a subject.

      Nope, they’re members! I thought they were really nice and understanding Managers before but now I know why.

      • moyerguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s very interesting. Where I live in the United States managers are almost never allowed to be part of a union. I’ve never been a manager so I’m not sure why but my understanding is most companies claim it’s a “conflict of interest.” Maybe I’ve just worked at shitty places but it just surprised me to read your managers are union members.

        • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it confused me too since in my last company I know for a fact that the mangers were asked to leave the Union when they were promoted because it is a conflict of interests as you say.

          I mean they are lower level management, the guy that interviewed me is a Team Leader and his Manager is the guy who organises the personelle although I don’t know his title.

          I don’t think any higher ups are Union members.

          Interestingly, my first interaction with this Union is a shift change that affects me. They’re compressing our hours to be done over 3 days instead of 5 and they’re making us work a Saturday shift. We’re happy with the change as a majority but the Union doesn’t like the Saturday and wanted to fight for more money for the shift.

          They stepped in too late though, and all suggestions have fallen on deaf ears so there’s a potential for a Fight, but I don’t think it’s gonna happen.

          What I found interesting was the Manager that’s a Union member agreed with the Union interceding at the time, but then later said it was a mistake that was justaking the process more complicated than it needed to be. The higher up manager was REALLY PISSED OFF with the Union interference, and that was for the good in my opinion, because it meant that the Union still has enough clout to cause headaches.