• aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          It’s probably a very unpopular opinion, but I feel like Jon Stewart is a bit overrated. He was at the height of his powers in the GWB era and he helped Kerry to a hefty loss, and then followed that up by running pointless and distracting political rallies that did nothing at all to prevent the 2010 shellacking by the tea party.

          He helped provide cover for Trump this election cycle by laughing at him and at times even joking that he was gonna vote for Trump. I guarantee the daily show episodes that couch potato democrats like myself used to soothe themselves during this sleep walk into fascism will age like milk.

          I couldn’t even bear to watch the election night coverage him and Colbert were doing and I’m sure that it got grim as hell (similar to coverage of 2016) as the jokes started to not match the bleak reality of an upcoming second Trump term.

          His lasting political advocacy efforts for things (largely outside of the media) like the 9/11 first responders and Iraqi burn pit veterans are admirable though.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 days ago

        He seems like a person that would go to great lengths to avoid politics, but he can’t be any worse than any of the existing options.

      • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        Keanu Reeves did a Netflix deal/Series with pseudoscientist and pseudoarchaeologist Graham Hancock

        Milo Rossi has a series on YT going through just how bad Hancock is when it comes to pseudoarchaeology here

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      17 days ago

      Let’s get AOC to run. She’ll be old enough next time 'round.

      It’s clear the “catering to moderates” strategy has been a catastrophic failure. I say we change gears and actually put up a candidate that isn’t going to try and “play both sides.”

      AOC hasn’t been afraid to criticize her party’s decisions, I think she could take the platform Bernie Sanders took and actually make some progress.

      Problem is, the DNC would actually need to fucking cooperate instead of falling into their same old tried and failed ways, unlike they did with Bernie both times he ran. I don’t see that happening, and as always, third parties aren’t really an option.

      • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        17 days ago

        Problem is that she’s a woman, and a statistically significant chunk of America is repulsed by idea of being ruled by a woman. (I’m not going to say a large portion, but big enough that it played a factor in this election)

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m not in the US, so I won’t be voting for any presidential candidates, but I’ve been impressed with AOC whenever I’ve seen her in interviews.

        You’re right about the infighting thing though, and it seems to be endemic to left leaning parties everywhere, whereas the right usually seem to be a much more cohesive team.

        • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Happens in Canada too, only we actually have multiple parties. but the left sides tend to split the vote more whereas the right manages to have less splintering and usually will back one of the major conservative parties. It sucks honestly but I’m okay with it because at least I don’t feel my vote is wasted when I vote for an alternative.