Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sverit@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 years ago

Mozilla will open Firefox for Android for more extensions

blog.mozilla.org

external-link
message-square
146
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.world
  • android@lemmy.world
  • browsers@lemmy.ml
  • technology@lemmy.ml
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • fossdroid@lemmit.online
  • technology@lemmit.online
  • android@lemdro.id
  • technology@hexbear.net
916
external-link

Mozilla will open Firefox for Android for more extensions

blog.mozilla.org

sverit@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 2 years ago
message-square
146
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • firefox@lemmy.world
  • android@lemmy.world
  • browsers@lemmy.ml
  • technology@lemmy.ml
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • fossdroid@lemmit.online
  • technology@lemmit.online
  • android@lemdro.id
  • technology@hexbear.net
blog.mozilla.org | 504: Gateway time-out
blog.mozilla.org
external-link
  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    why it was restricted in the first place?

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because there were enough incompatibilities to make it a hassle. But when they were sorting out the Web Manifest v3, they designed it with desktop and mobile in mind, so new extensions won’t have problems.

      • bankimu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest.

        I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness.

        • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It would be nice to have stuff here to break this down

    • ItsTom87@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maybe they couldn’t guarantee that the mobile version could run well with all of them? That’s what I’ve always assumed.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

      • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could’ve just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn’t worth the headache.

        • frogfruit@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you use Beta or Nightly, you can turn on dev tools and use a custom addon list from a collection in your user account. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extension-support-in-firefox-for-android-nightly/

        • TheLeechiestLeech@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          There is a hidden way to activate more extensions and most - if not the vast majority - extensions work fine.

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          There is a hidden setting for essentially that. It might be exclusive to Nightly though, idk since all I need is UBO

Technology@beehaw.org

technology@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 200 users / day
  • 1.33K users / week
  • 3.09K users / month
  • 7.67K users / 6 months
  • 1.44K local subscribers
  • 38.6K subscribers
  • 4.17K Posts
  • 87.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
  • gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
  • rs5th@beehaw.org
  • coldredlight@beehaw.org
  • Leigh@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org