• Moops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      14 days ago

      Right!? I’ve been so confused by the notion of Trump being the anti-Israel vote. That’s not what I heard him say.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        14 days ago

        I had someone arguing at me here, with the supreme confidence of the ignorant, that trump and Harris would be the same for Palestineans.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          I thought those accounts went dormant after the election. Maybe there’s still some OpenAI credit left on the controller?

          • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            14 days ago

            They are trying to foment division among trump’s opposition, the disinfo machines never stop until there is a civil war or collapse.

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            14 days ago

            One of those dumb fucks already responded here.

            But Id like to think they’re AI instead of just mind numbingly stupid.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          14 days ago

          The Harris/Biden comparison was more valid, although we can’t be sure she would stay that path once in office and with pressure from Congress and public. But at least there was a chance of both of those. Anyone who thought Trump wouldn’t ramp things up or would listen to calls for change…I don’t know what they were thinking. He’s never done that, never been like that. His history as a businessman and as a President for four years is right there to review.

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 days ago

            The thing is that Harris could be moved by progressives winning primaries and the 2026 midterms at the very least. There is almost no hope of something similar for trump.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 days ago

          I mean yeah he would be/is, at least until Israel’s genocide is over. There is literally nothing Trump can do (at least while beholden to the public and Congress) in this war that Biden hasn’t already done.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 days ago

              I mean he is to an extent. Everyone is talking like the fascist project in America is finished, but it’s not and there’s no guarantee they’ll be able to complete it. That said it’s mostly Congress doing the heavy lifting here; there are enough sane Republicans that Trump wouldn’t be able to get away with some of the more outrageous stuff.

              • neatchee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                14 days ago

                I would love to see the list of Republicans in Congress whose districts/states WEREN’T carried by pro-Trump zealots and who WOULDN’T lose their seats if they went against Trump.

                Hint: it could fit on an index card, double spaced

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  I mean there were Republicans opposed to one of his appointments (don’t remember who) and you only need four of them to side with the Democrats to get a majority.

            • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              People have been yammering on for many years that ‘America needs a businessman for a leader’ without realizing how fucked that statement is. The idea that business people are always efficient and effective doesn’t even capture what the hell happens normally or even the difference between a business and government.

              Also for ‘businessmen’ like Trump who have had numerous bankruptcies, also have an affinity for routinely breaking the law and regulations as a matter of course. This is because major companies ALWAYS have multiple lawsuits and violations investigations going on that they try to delay and delay, because the legal fees and fines and such are all factored into the cost of business. Violate safety regulations? No problem. It is better (and cheaper) to fight the injury lawsuits and occassionally have to pay out than simply to have the regulations fully complied with. Fucked some employees over and violate contract terms on the regular? By the time the lawsuit gets heard it’ll be years and they have gotten all what they wanted and much more, then maybe they can settle out of court for a few peanuts after they exhausted the plaintiff.

              Do you realize how batshit insane Trump’s picks for his cabinet are? They are done in large part because he A: Wants to establish dominance over congress by seeing if they contest him, and B: Making them have to WORK and FIGHT to get those picks contested, which may not be successful and will waste tons of time and resources. This is EXACTLY how businesses operate and have been operating for many, many years.

              This is why a businessman for a leader is the worst thing ever.

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            14 days ago

            That’s the silliest damn thing.

            Why do you think Israel announced they were annexing the West Bank right after the election?

            Ignorant goddamn children spouting off about global politics.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              So first, I can’t actually find anything about this except Smotrich pushing for annexation so do you have a source that says they’re going to go forward with annexation? Now second, Smotrich started yapping about annexing West Bank settlements (not the whole West Bank; if Israel did that they’d have to give Palestinians rights) literally a day or two after the election, meaning he already had plans for something similar before then. You don’t just wake up and start taking steps towards annexing an occupied territory that’s not how that works.

              • Lauchs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                13 days ago

                You mean, finance minister Smotrich?

                And yes, believe it or not, the Israelis were not the only people on Earth who didn’t know about the election of their largest ally and presumably gameplanned for either a Harris or trump victory.

                The fact Smotrich held back from saying anything until after the election tells you the election mattered in terms of what happens next.

              • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                That is precisely why you had to avoid trump’s carte blanche at all costs.

        • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          I I genuinely wonder what would change? What’s worse than denying and backing the genocide with weapons, soldiers and money under Biden? What worse could Trump do?

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            13 days ago

            The West Bank, where roughly half of Palestineans live was more or less left alone as one of yhr administrations red lines (also, Iran’s oil/nuclear facilities.)

            With trump incoming, it seems Israel feels they have a green light to expand in the West Bank.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 days ago

            The current issues will end, Biden was at least making noises to get it to stop, Biden was trying to prevent the regional war Iran has been working on, and there were decent indications there would be recovery funding.

            Trump indicated none of that and all signs point to encouraging more atrocity

            • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              Trying to stop a genocide is trying to start a regional war ? You guys have an extremely skewed view of the world.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I’m not.

        A significant percentage of likely Democratic voters in several states voted “undecided” in the primaries with the public, stated purpose of making it clear to Biden/Harris that they wanted changes with regard to US policy on Israel’s genocide.

        Biden/Harris ignored them.

        Of course they didn’t get those votes. It’s one thing to double-down on bombing kids. It’s another to double-down on bombing kids and also tell voters to go fuck themselves.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    14 days ago

    “Trump won because of us and we’re not happy with his Secretary of State pick and others,” said Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor who chaired the Abandon Harris campaign in Pennsylvania and co-founded Muslims for Trump.

    Nazarko said the community would continue pressing to make its voices heard after rallying votes to help Trump win. “At least we’re on the map.”

    Hate to break it to him, but Team Trump’s plan is for Gaza to be completely off the map.

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    14 days ago

    Rola Makki, the Lebanese American, Muslim vice chair for outreach of the Michigan Republican Party, shrugged off the criticism. “I don’t think everyone’s going to be happy with every appointment Trump makes, but the outcome is what matters,” she said. “I do know that Trump wants peace, and what people need to realize is that there’s 50,000 dead Palestinians and 3,000 dead Lebanese, and that’s happened during the current administration.”

    And trump will let Netanyahu wipe all the Palestinians off the map and murder even more Lebanese. I hope it’s all worth it to you.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 days ago

      How do brainless fools like this ever make it to positions of influence? Trump has been openly supporting both Israel and Russia since the start. His version of “peace” is capitulation and/or elimination of the victims.

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor who chaired the Abandon Harris campaign in Pennsylvania and co-founded Muslims for Trump.

    But look on the bright side, this guy is gonna be able to buy soooOOOoooo much gas. Who’s that cool cat over there just driving in circles flexing? Damn, that’s Rabiul, smart guy, smart guy. Heard they mistook his family for illegals, now he’s free as a bird

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    13 days ago

    You casts your vote, you takes your choice. And you takes the consequences of your utterly braindead choice.

    I can’t figure out how the fuck any Muslim even barely knowledgeable of trump doesn’t know that as a republican, his whole platform is built on the backs of Israel-worshipping US Christians. They, like many other groups, may as well be lambs voting for the wolf.

  • RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    14 days ago

    I don’t understand it. How is anyone so politically deaf and blind? Even if the only thing you only listened to was Trumptler’s word-vomit, this is exactly what he said he would do. And you still fucking voted for this assclown? How??

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    lol what a bunch of morons! They should have stuck to voting for the pro-israel democratic party!!!

  • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    1.Oh no ! I am totally completely sure Harris wasn’t gonna do the same! If only she won ! the Palestinian genocide that was backed and aided under Biden and her would’ve continued as usual, but uhhh… Yeah…

    2.Their face was already being eaten and voting to change who’s eating it was probably more of “fuck you ! Get eaten too fuckers”. If and only if there’s a big number of Muslim voters that instead of simply abstaining from voting decided to vote Trump out of spite, but this lead me to my third point.

    1. TimesofIsrael isn’t the most reliable source to get info about muslims. I would guess you wouldn’t have had read the “Nazi daily” to get info about the jewish population in WW2.
    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      this is from reuters, you should check the other post, which copies reuters, but throws away the links.

      And yea, Harris had a 20% chance to stop the war (I guess now we’ll never know), whereas with trump you had a 99% chance that Palestine is gone from the map.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        The 20% you speak of is pure cope, nothing more. The messaging was consistent and it was a huge “fuck you”.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          How would you know? trump won and you know what he’s gonna do, did you ever consider that was a possibility? Contributing to his victory was the greatest gift to bibi for his atrocities.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Because we just had a Biden term and a year of escalation happening, with no actual steps to stop it. Only PR moves like the pier, that was only there for the IDF, not for the aid. Then we had the campaign, with messaging being “we don’t care about Palestine” and nothing else.

            Like, holy shit, you could just as well say “how would you know Trump is going to be bad for Palestine?” and it would be exactly as nonsensical - because we have the pattern of behavior from earlier and the campaigning. Harris embraced Biden’s politics instead of distancing herself from them, it’s that simple.

            Right now Biden is unburdened by a presidential campaign. He could do whatever he wants, or at least try to. He is trying to send as much weapons to Ukraine as possible (which is great don’t get me wrong). He is acting. Yet jack shit is done with Palestine because there is no political will to do anything.

            And all of this because of people who tried to push “go vote for her anyway”. As if we are in some bizzarro world where a party gets people’s votes for not doing what the people want them to do.

            • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              Whatever, it’s done now. Live with your choice and the consequences.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 days ago

                Sure, just don’t complain that Biden or Harris would’ve been different on Palestine.

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I am pro-palestinian and say fuck it ! Let there be a full war in the middle east. USA would back up Israel whether its Harris or Trump anyway. No amount of genocide is acceptable and no amount of backing genocide is acceptable. Fuck humanity ! thank god we’re fucking ourselves with climate change.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I am not shocked. I am not shocked at anything anymore. It’s like the South American dude who said he would still love Trump even if Trump deported him and his entire family…