TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up144file-textcross-posted to: movies@lemm.ee
arrow-up144external-linkAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlTheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: movies@lemm.ee
minus-squarexkbx@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·5 days agoMaking films isn’t free, they have to have expenses. What do you want them to do, reduce the spending on the money laundering?
Making films isn’t free, they have to have expenses. What do you want them to do, reduce the spending on the money laundering?