Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Vim bindings are dumb and get in the way. I will never understand the appeal of modal editing. Emacs was always the superior program since it was released by Richard Stallman in 1985.

      • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m sorry that I don’t HJKL everywhere. Some people prefer their refined and exquisite: C-b, C-n, C-p, C-f.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stallman didn’t invent Emacs; Moon and Steele did. Stallman ported it from TECO to Lisp — and not a particularly good Lisp. GNU Emacs shoulda been replaced by something in Common Lisp or Scheme decades ago.

    • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Emacs was always the superior program since it was released by Richard Stallman in 1985.

      Easily agreed.

      That being said I can’t go back from my meow modal keybindings

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone that uses either is just doing so to feel superior, people sitting on 64 gig of ram, 32 core processors, 4090 gfx cards but they can’t spare the system resources for a proper gui? People only like them because they’re hard to use and awkward.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I prefer Microsoft/Apple/IBM style key bindings (Ctrl+X to cut, Ctrl+V to paste, etc). Text editors don’t need to have a completely different set of key bindings from everything else.