Summary

The US’s approval for Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles, capable of striking targets nearly 200 miles away, marks a significant escalation in Ukraine’s ability to retaliate against Russian aggression.

The move, coming after intense lobbying by Kyiv, allows Ukraine to target Russian positions with more precision and destruction than prior weapons.

Russia has condemned the decision as a provocation risking world war.

Analysts suggest the policy shift, reportedly limited to Russia’s Kursk region, aligns with U.S. efforts to support Ukraine without triggering broader conflict.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    9 days ago

    The commencement of whining about how the victim defending themselves is horribly unfair, unreasonable, and must be stopped at all costs, is always a feature of bullying. I don’t know why, but it is.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Russia brought another country in to fight. Full stop. Theatrics.

    And I think it’s likely. And it’s their fault.

    Edit: We lose too, btw. Head in the clouds, cocks in our hands, and then everyone is going to wonder why the power went out and the taps went dry on day one.

    I swear half the US wants it because they think they’ll wipe the floor gg and go back to drinking.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      9 days ago

      For any of this to lead to “world war” one of two things has to happen:

      1. The US directly enters the war on the side of Ukraine - If this didn’t happen at any point in the last two years, it’s not suddenly going to happen now. And it’s not more likely to happen because the US “provokes” Russia, so it’s irrelevant anyway.

      2. Russia directly attacks a NATO country - Why would Russia ever do this? They can’t even defeat a NATO aligned independent nation. How the fuck would they ever have a hope in hell of defeating all of NATO? In what possible way would they benefit from escalating the war?

      Russia claiming that American “provocations” will lead to world war is meaningless because the reality is that for them to be “provoked” into starting a war they would have to be provoked into voluntarily deleting their entire country.

      No matter how badly this hypothetical world war 3 goes for anyone else, even if - no, especially if - it becomes a total nuclear war, the one guarantee is that Russia loses. And they lose hard. Putin’s best case scenario here is great he Hitler’s himself in a bunker in a few years and that’s if he’s lucky.

      So unless Putin and every single person in his orbit have joined a suicide cult and are already cooking up a big old bowl of spicy Kool-Aid, there is no reason whatsoever to take these claims seriously.

      • A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Serious question:

        What about China and Xi Jinping? North Korea has already thrown they’re very flimsy and small hat into the ring…barely, but they did send troops.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 days ago

          What about them? Suppose China sends 100,000 troops to Ukraine? How does that expand the conflict in any way?

          This is the problem with people just buying this Russian line about America “escalating” the conflict. Increasing the scale or intensity of the conflict in Ukraine has zero bearing on its scope. China entering the war doesn’t force America, or any other NATO country, to suddenly become involved.

          It doesn’t matter if China sends a million troops. Ten million. At the end of the day the conflict is still between Ukraine, Russia, and Russia’s co-beligerants. Even if Ukraine somehow ended up invading China, this still doesn’t directly involvre NATO in the war.

          The only thing that can possibly involve NATO is either NATO choosing to get directly involved, or some opposing party directly attacking NATO. And none of those opposing parties have anything to gain by attacking NATO. So why would they?

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Sorry if I seem like I’m getting a little bent out of shape about this stuff. It frustrates me because Russian propaganda in this area has been far, far more successful than it has any right to be. It’s extremely easy to see through once you sit back and examine the basic mechanics of the situation, but I understand that that’s difficult to do when being faced with something as terrifying as the threat of a global conflict.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m so glad I just retired from the US military. I’d hate to be serving while that dictator asshole comes back. I was still serving the first time he took office and it was bad times for us. We were able to push back on his more extreme demands of the military, but we don’t have a Democrat-controlled govt to keep him in check this time around.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        More importantly, we don’t have any morally upstanding senators with the balls to hold the fucking Republicans in line. Even McCain had to find out he was dying of brain cancer before he stood against the machine to defend the right to healthcare.

        Please correct me if I’m wrong, but there aren’t any Republicans left that will do that.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m kind of hopeful, actually, that the fact that they are publically whining so much about escalating to a world war is an indication that they don’t have the means to do so, short of going Nuclear, and I think even Putin realizes how that will end up.

      I mean, he is already bringing in foreign fighters. isn’t that a concession that Russian fighters can’t do the job in Ukraine themselves? If they had the means to escalate while still fighting in Ukraine, they wouldn’t whine about it, they would just do it.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 days ago

        What’s extra sickening to me, is that this cat has no trouble operating under the assumption that his own life, and power, and glory, are worth these unending untold thousands of other lives, when in actuality his life is worth less than any one of these soldiers’.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 days ago

    In other words russias invasion of ukraine could cause a world war. Its not the ukrainians who decided to fuck around with russians.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ah yes, tell us more about how Russia’s sudden invasion and annexization of Crimea following Euromaidan was the fault of US backed Ukrainians.

        Best case, you’re going to blame this on the fact that native Ukrainians staged a revolution to remove their corrupt president that was trying to buddy up with the sovereign that has been abusing and betraying them since 1941. To which I say, good for them. The annexation of Crimea came during the power vacuum following that when Putin saw that his good buddy sycophant Yanukovych had been removed by a hostile electorate. Putin saw his slaves trying to make a break for freedom and decided to bring his fist down on it.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Any suggestion that Crimea doesn’t prefer being in Russian Federation compared to under nazi rule committed to destroying them is delusional propaganda. Crimea was transferred to Ukraine in late 1950s. No one there had to bother learning Ukrainian language and little Ukrainian emigration occurred there.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    World War against who? You have nukes and a bunch of conventional forces which can’t even beat Ukraine. If you have a suicide wish then fucking get it over with already and stop jerking us around

    • NecroParagon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      To be fair to them, there’s not a ton of militaries that could beat Ukraine. They’re pretty cracked. Gotta give them that, they’re some of the best fighters we’ve seen in a very long time.

      Except when it comes to retreating effectively. They suck at that part.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 days ago

    Make no mistake, we were headed there anyway.

    Sadly with great orange Hitler in charge we’re probably going to be the axis powers this time along with Putin and Winnie the Pooh and the rest of the world doesn’t stand a chance because we have all the bombs.

    • MisterLister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      I doubt the US is going to play an active role in that new Axis, no matter how much taintlicking Trump does… I think it’s more likely we are simply declawed mostly due to a sudden internal focus shift (attempting to reroute the military to purge “illegals” and whatever other civil strife ensues as a result), leading to an effective breakdown of global presence and influence.

      Once Trump takes office, the US is pretty much guaranteed to no longer be a global superpower. Maybe not overnight, but the damage done will take generations to fix and that’s probably the real goal here… not to make the US join hands with them, but to entirely neutralize us as a potential threat or obstacle. We might still have all the bombs, but what use are they when our incoming government is more likely to use them on our own cities or be paralyzed with infighting about maybe not using them on our own cities?

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Counterpoint: the military attack on illegals is a first step. An attempt to put the blame for all of our country’s ills onto a specific class or ethnicity. This is exactly what Hitler did with the Jews. The next step would be to make a play to convince the populace that annexing another country would be an effective solution to cure the problems of the nation.

        The fat orange fuck has literally bragged about reading Mein Kampf. He’s reading from Hitler’s playbook and using it as an instruction manual.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 days ago

    Newsflash: there is already a war. A one Russia can end tomorrow if they fuck off back into their borders.

    • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      That Putin has threatened to end the world? It’s in the 20’s at least, but I lost count a while ago.

      Part of me wishes he’d go ahead and pull the pin. Dealing with the consequences would probably distract Trump and his cronies for his entire term and would reduce the head count of his supporters, giving the sane folks in the US a chance to regroup.