Perks of being a Founding Member (with Nukes). The veto is intended to illustrate the Superpower status of the nation and the implicit necessity of their consent before your UN Peacekeepers collide with US War Profiteers.
If we didn’t have the veto we would simply hire nazis to make a new nato for ourselves and give us veto power. Which… I think is exactly what happened in the first place if I think about the league of nations.
So why does the US have a veto vote anyway? Seems like no one should
Cuz they were on the winning side of WW2. Security council veto power is held by China, US, UK, France, and Russia
Also nukes, I’d imagine.
If the veto power is going to exist we should be honest about what it means and it should be “every country with nukes”
The DPRK should be a permanent member of the security council
Same same
Right? There should be a veto override mechanism so you can’t block things literally EVERY OTHER COUNTRY wants with your one vote.
Abolish the UN
Perks of being a Founding Member (with Nukes). The veto is intended to illustrate the Superpower status of the nation and the implicit necessity of their consent before your UN Peacekeepers collide with US War Profiteers.
If we didn’t have the veto we would simply hire nazis to make a new nato for ourselves and give us veto power. Which… I think is exactly what happened in the first place if I think about the league of nations.
Breaking: Holy Roman Empire appoints Anti-Pope