renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1751
arrow-up1751external-linkThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up38·1 year agoI really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
minus-squareJusticeForPorygon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up34·edit-21 year agoNo one: deranger@sh.itjust.works:
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up13·edit-21 year agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year ago“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.
I really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
No one:
deranger@sh.itjust.works:
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.
“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.