dyen49k@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThey are watchingmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up11.17K
arrow-up11.17KimageThey are watchingmedia.kbin.socialdyen49k@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-squareeran_morad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoYes, and one CAN integrate by taking paper cuttings and dispense entirely with the idea of infinity.
minus-squaremonotrox@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI was just trying to make an argument that imaginary numbers were technically not necessary and thus it makes historical sense that they werent seen as something ‘real’. Im not trying to get people to stop using them ;)
minus-squareeran_morad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoEh, this is not worth your time or mine to argue about. Let’s move on. Also, I take your point.
Yes, and one CAN integrate by taking paper cuttings and dispense entirely with the idea of infinity.
I was just trying to make an argument that imaginary numbers were technically not necessary and thus it makes historical sense that they werent seen as something ‘real’. Im not trying to get people to stop using them ;)
Eh, this is not worth your time or mine to argue about. Let’s move on. Also, I take your point.