• IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t matter the reviews or review bombing to Blizzard. The fact remains that no matter how actually shitty the game is Blizzard is making record profits off of the game.

    That’s all Blizzard looks at these days. Is it making them money? And the answer is an abundant yes. So for whatever hate there is, the fact that players are still handing them fistfuls of cash indicates full success to them.

    • Magiccupcake@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they’re making record profits why did they decide to come to steam?

      I think their player numbers have dropped and they’re trying to boost them.

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been mostly out of the loop for overwatch but my guess is so that can have even more recorder profits

          • roon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re gonna do the profitiest profit that anyone has ever profited

            • empireOfLove
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I liked the part where Bobby Kotick said “its profiting time” and then profited all over the place

        • fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Steam takes 30%. If they thought they could drive people to their standalone launcher they would be doing that

          • blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think that is correct; Steam usually takes 30%, but I thought some of the larger publishers negotiated different (secret) rates.

      • Whom@beehaw.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It seems most likely to me that it’s prep for the rest of the Microsoft deal so they can claim to regulators they aren’t using their ever-growing control to choke out other platforms. Same reason they’re making those promises about Call of Duty on Switch.

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess this could be a glass half full kind of situation.

      But they also are not making as much money as they could have if they delivered on a good game. Even if they got only 5% of steam, that is still 95% of steam that didn’t buy it.

      Sure, you can make the argument that they still got into a new market. However, if your product was scientifically engineered to appeal to the most demographics, then only 5% of that market is concerning.

    • beefcat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Review bombing doesn’t actually help anyone, it just makes people question the validity of user reviews in general.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I completely understand the hc gamer community hating the game, I personally, as a 37 yo working person, have had co-op and solo fun for over 200h with a few friends.

      For me, that’s well worth the price of the game. And no I won’t be buying any passes and I won’t even finish season 1 because there’s nothing really that new there, but objectively D4 was a good fucking game, especially for couch co-op lovers.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s all any publicly traded company looks at because that’s all that actually matters for them