• AngryMob
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes obviously. One is completely transparent about being incomplete, often discounted. The other is deceitful and lying about incomplete and charging you full price.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Oh, I thought they issued refunds to those that wanted it. Seems they should have just labeled it differently at launch.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. An early access is meant not to be a release version so everyone can wait for a 1.0 release if they want. NMS released as a 1.0 release, except that it was more of an overpromised 0.1 release. Sean Murray straight up lied to people about the game.

      Games like Project Zomboid, which I play & follow for almost 14 years now, have never claimed to be finished during all their time, or promised features that weren’t there.

      Guess which title I still regret buying? I hope they really learned their lesson with this one and don’t make the same mistake with their other title. Otherwise Murray will become the next Molyneux. Or worse, I hope they don’t learned that they can release a purposefully incomplete game by withholding features and content, adding simple easy to fix bugs, just to add & fix all that over the following months & years to be seen as game dev heroes. That’d be a terrifying new business model.