• robin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also you need to be so far incredibly detached from reality if you think antifa is an actual thing.

    I agree with the rest of your post, but i’m a bit confused by this comment. Are you saying antifa doesn’t exist?

    • SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Antifa is decentralized like BLM. There isn’t really an organization so there isn’t really a leader. You can’t stop antifa because of that. It’s more an ideology and philosophy.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        So now this begs the question, are “ideologies” “real?” What is reality, simply things you can sense? Is happiness not real? Love? Sadness? Imo, ideologies and concepts can both be described as “real” same as things you can experience with your senses.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not real as in it’s not an entity. Of course it’s a concept, nobody denied that.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t be so sure. Without defining terms it seems some people may be confused on your meaning depending on their conception of what constitutes reality, anyway.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think it’s worth getting bogged down by semantics, but as it is, I feel like it’s pretty clear what it’s not

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s not semantics, it’s either a deflection or a problem of defining terms. If someone says “something something antifa” you know they’re talking about the disorganized association of like minded individuals who self identifies as antifa, which we seem to both agree "exists.” They didn’t say “I remember the first time I met Steve Bavelacqua, Chairman of the Board of The Antifas™, he was but a young lad then.” Pretending they did is disingenuous and we all know that, it just turns into this exact bullshit where someone claims, ironically semantically, that “The Antifas™” doesn’t exist in an attempt to conflate it with “antifa the concept doesn’t exist,” which is what anyone is talking about when they say “antifa,” except maybe Tucker Carlson or some shit. If you really think they’re talking about an organized group ask them, if they say “no you idiot I mean the loose association of people who self identify as antifa, not my good friend Steve, owner operator of Antifa LLC,” you’re good, if they do mention Antifa©®LLCBBC, then correct them. Otherwise it reads as deflection, gaslighting, or denial, since you sound like you’re saying the thing which we both agree, even if semantically, is “real,” is not real.