merari42@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSignaling that you are a man that can provide for a familylemmy.worldimagemessage-square253fedilinkarrow-up11.05K
arrow-up11.05KimageSignaling that you are a man that can provide for a familylemmy.worldmerari42@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square253fedilink
minus-squarearchonet@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·edit-21 year agoI suggest you keep it to yourself next time, then, as you have only furthered the image that vegans are smug asshats who can’t shut the fuck up about being vegan. Maybe that’s what you want though, it’s just a suggestion. c:
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoIf u took offence then it proves u are everything they claimed u to be.
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoThat logic is bad and you should feel bad. You suck. If this comment makes you mad, you’re only proving my point /s
minus-squareSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoIt is not polite to use ad hominems rather than a logical argument.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoyet you, without evidence, attack your interlocutors as murderers.
minus-squareChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThey made an “if/then” statement based on your statement. They attacked the idea, not the person making it. No ad hominem detected.
I suggest you keep it to yourself next time, then, as you have only furthered the image that vegans are smug asshats who can’t shut the fuck up about being vegan.
Maybe that’s what you want though, it’s just a suggestion. c:
Rude comment.
If u took offence then it proves u are everything they claimed u to be.
That logic is bad and you should feel bad. You suck. If this comment makes you mad, you’re only proving my point /s
It is not polite to use ad hominems rather than a logical argument.
yet you, without evidence, attack your interlocutors as murderers.
They made an “if/then” statement based on your statement. They attacked the idea, not the person making it. No ad hominem detected.
Why are you angered?