whereas achievements from Western nations rarely get this treatment
I have to disagree, commercial news loves controversy and the negative, they always pull this shit, regardless of country. Even worse, what we have here is a clickbait headline that isn’t even descriptive of the article
Come on, you must see a ton of popsci articles like “This invention might end aging forever!” and “School teacher invents new green fuel” and “Why is California leading the world in [whatever]?”
Their point is that Approved countries get fluff pieces like that while China gets, from comparable material, a source of criticism that is deemed important enough to put in the headline.
When controversy or drama happens in the US it’s just reported as drama. They don’t extrapolate it to the entire nation to help reinforce some narrative that it’s a totalitarian state in decline. They articles don’t usually start with “In the US…”, unlike when anything happens in China.
Sure, US news doesn’t paint the US with a broad brush, but it does paint France, Germany, Canada, Mexico, Australia, and pretty much every other country with a broad brush. Internally, commercial media does it to US states, cities, races, religions, political parties, and more
Even worse, what we have here is a clickbait headline that isn’t even descriptive of the article
the point is that positive news out of China gets given a clickbait title that plays up the controversy while positive news from the west gets given a clickbait title that oversells the promise of the technology. why is this an observable trend in media, I wonder…
I have to disagree, commercial news loves controversy and the negative, they always pull this shit, regardless of country. Even worse, what we have here is a clickbait headline that isn’t even descriptive of the article
Come on, you must see a ton of popsci articles like “This invention might end aging forever!” and “School teacher invents new green fuel” and “Why is California leading the world in [whatever]?”
Their point is that Approved countries get fluff pieces like that while China gets, from comparable material, a source of criticism that is deemed important enough to put in the headline.
When controversy or drama happens in the US it’s just reported as drama. They don’t extrapolate it to the entire nation to help reinforce some narrative that it’s a totalitarian state in decline. They articles don’t usually start with “In the US…”, unlike when anything happens in China.
Sure, US news doesn’t paint the US with a broad brush, but it does paint France, Germany, Canada, Mexico, Australia, and pretty much every other country with a broad brush. Internally, commercial media does it to US states, cities, races, religions, political parties, and more
Excluding maybe Mexico, none of those other countries get near the same hostility as China, or the Developing World in general.
the point is that positive news out of China gets given a clickbait title that plays up the controversy while positive news from the west gets given a clickbait title that oversells the promise of the technology. why is this an observable trend in media, I wonder…