• LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    You guys do realize that you are glorifying a literal murderer, right? Someone who killed a human being in cold blood.

    Okay, just checking.

    • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Someone who killed a human being in cold blood.

      Someone who killed someone who kills people by pretending to be a health insurance, whilst not paying them when people try to use said insurance in cold blood.

      The sentence is a little longer if you give the full context. Nobody was innocent here.

    • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      All of our hands are at least speckled with blood for complicity in reaping the benifits of our society?

      -Sent from iPhone 17Pro Max Plus

      • LiPoly@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        So you’re saying you’re pro vigilantes and pro death penalty without court order?

        Besides, that CEO didn’t kill anyone personally. One could argue you killed a few kids yourself by buying cheap electronics and clothing. If you now start just killing people that you think deserve dying because of some moral standard you think you have, you’re a fucking lunatic without any moral standard.

        • pfm@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Can you explain why only victims of the likes of Thompson should fear, but the CEOs don’t need to fear even though they profit from rejecting life- or health-saving treatments?

        • Luminocta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So, Hitler wasn’t bad. Stalin was OK, didn’t kill anyone right?

          But their decisions did. Their position of power allowed them to.

          Just cause they didn’t murder directly doesn’t mean they played a fair game. They knew exactly what they were doing. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes goes for bad people too.

            • ddplf@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 minutes ago

              The CEO is however a robber baron operating at the times of peace, using different methods but achieving the same end - people dying, most often miserably. I don’t see how that’s better.

            • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 minutes ago

              Right, but still a person who had a part in making the lives of lots of people miserable or unnecessarily short.
              If a CEO isn’t responsible for the policies of the company they’re CEO of, why would you need a CEO in the first place?

            • Luminocta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Honestly that fact was known to me, but I just realized he was the good guy/hero we needed after what he did…

        • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          He didn’t kill personally, he just gave orders to other people to kill people.
          Which means his killer didn’t kill anyone personally either, he just pressed some trigger and the gun did everything else