Image is of Assad’s presidential palace in 2013. There’s more images of it in this article, though the words in it aren’t worth reading.
Here is Assad’s version of events. I like to imagine he’s making one of those Youtuber apology videos where they sigh at the start and talk in a chastised yet somewhat defensive tone of voice.
As terrorism spread across Syria and ultimately reached Damascus on the evening of Saturday 7th December 2024, questions arose about the president’s fate and whereabouts. This occurred amidst a flood of misinformation and narratives far removed from the truth, aimed at recasting international terrorism as a liberation revolution for Syria.
At such a critical juncture in the nation’s history, where truth must take precedence, it is essential to address these distortions. Unfortunately, the prevailing circumstances at the time, including a total communication blackout for security reasons, delayed the release of this statement. This does not replace a detailed account of the events that unfolded, which will be provided when the opportunity allows.
First, my departure from Syria was neither planned nor did it occur during the final hours of the battles, as some have claimed. On the contrary, I remained in Damascus, carrying out my duties until the early hours of Sunday 8th December 2024. As terrorist forces infiltrated Damascus, I moved to Latakia in co-ordination with our Russian allies to oversee combat operations. Upon arrival at the Hmeimim airbase that morning, it became clear that our forces had completely withdrawn from all battle lines and that the last army positions had fallen. As the field situation in the area continued to deteriorate, the Russian military base itself came under intensified attack by drone strikes.
With no viable means of leaving the base, Moscow requested that the base’s command arrange an immediate evacuation to Russia on the evening of Sunday 8th December. This took place a day after the fall of Damascus following the collapse of the final military positions and the resulting paralysis of all remaining state institutions.
At no point during these events did I consider stepping down or seeking refuge, nor was such a proposal made by any individual or party. The only course of action was to continue fighting against the terrorist onslaught.
I reaffirm that the person who, from the very first day of the war, refused to barter the salvation of his nation for personal gain, or to compromise his people in exchange for numerous offers and enticements is the same person who stood alongside the officers and soldiers of the army on the front lines, just metres from terrorists in the most dangerous and intense battlefields. He is the same person who, during the darkest years of the war, did not leave but remained with his family alongside his people, confronting terrorism under bombardment and the recurring threats of terrorist incursions into the capital over 14 years of war. Furthermore, the person who has never abandoned the resistance in Palestine and Lebanon, nor betrayed his allies who stood by him, cannot possibly be the same person who would forsake his own people or betray the army and nation to which he belongs.
I have never sought positions for personal gain but have always considered myself as a custodian of a national project, supported by the faith of the Syrian people, who believed in its vision. I have carried an unwavering conviction in their will and ability to protect the state, defend its institutions, and uphold their choices to the very last moment.
When the state falls into the hands of terrorism and the ability to make a meaningful contribution is lost, any position becomes void of purpose, rendering its occupation meaningless. This does not, in any way, diminish my profound sense of belonging to Syria and her people – a bond that remains unshaken by any position or circumstance. It is a belonging filled with hope that Syria will once again be free and independent.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Westerners who don’t speak the language or know anything about the culture thinking they know it all and trying to lecture the people who live there about what they should or shouldn’t do? Where have I heard of this before.
Crackers literally talk down to everyone, even the subjects-of-empire they live over and off of. I’m p sure every single one of us has a relevant story to point to this statement.
Many times though the “cracker” is a communist and the “subject-of-empire” is a liberal comprador. This type of logic leads to very stupid ends
Did I just hear “not all whites”? We get it, now learn about systemic issues instead of getting in your feelings about the one time you had a “more correct” opinion than a poc
ok have fun bowing before compradors and having a muddled unscientific view of the world
i’m not white, and I think it’s very stupid I have to say this to get your to admit I’m correct when I clearly am
Fair enough, sorry to assume. But the point still stands that a really fucking common experience that poc people have was pointed out, to which you responded “well it’s not like that all the time”. Yeah, I think we all know that, I think all of us here are trying to think about systems. What is the systemic purpose of pointing out that some white people are good eggs whenever poc share their everyday experiences?
I’m POC sharing my lives experience right now. Sit down and shut up, by your own logic whitey.
A very common experience I have is that some shitlib comprador is pushing a US-backed narrative and leftists take it seriously because of the ethnicity or race or nationality of the person delivering it. You should know by now about gusanos and why this method is not foolproof.
The empire is rainbow imperialism, while its aims are white supremacist it’s actual composition is very diverse. There are millions of token compradors they will put up between themselves and those seeking decolonization.
The context of the comment is talking about users on here being glad that Al Qaeda took over Syria and that Israel has defeated the axis of resistance. Those people are correctly criticized, whether they are Syrian or not is irrelevant. It’s never ok to support Zionism .
I don’t care about the feelings of white people, I’m not one of them. I care about the analysis being dogshit because someome believes every color revolution and comprador who spouts imperialist bullshit. The entire logic is flawed.
Thanks for sharing that. I personally took fraudogg’s comment to be an offhanded quip not really related to the top level comment. So I didn’t see the reason to say something like that in response, especially on a site so overwhelmingly filled with white anglos, who tend to take such moments to congratulate themselves of being “the good ones”
and I appreciate the edit lol
We are on an anonymous forum where anyone can claim to be anything, and they can use the credulity afforded by this type of dumb logic to dupe well meaning and naive leftists into accepting imperialist or reactionary narratives.
It’s a heuristic that is destined to fall flat on its face, it’s open to exploitation and is vulnerable to sell outs and bad actors. It’s taking what should be a universal materialist analysis based on concrete principles and turning it into post-modern liberal slop that we can do nothing with.
It turns what should be a joint collaborative effort to understand and analyze the world into a circular firing squad of position-jockeying. When what is said is less important than who is saying it we have entered the territory of ideology.
And many times, the cracker in question is a white supremacist, give a damn what they call themselves when the klan hood is in the closet; I could do this all day with any number of self-satisfied settler armchair posters, but frankly, I couldn’t be fucked to beyond this response. Have a good one.
Your logic leads you to glorifying color revolutions and promoting grifters and compradors. It’s not good. People are not born correct, they have to use analysis and be educated in the correct way to understand their own interests. Many colonial subjects have their minds colonized as well and partake and benefit from the colonization. You will find no shortage of Liberal tokens to shield imperialism, and if we just accept the “white people can never talk back to colonized subjects” logic then we are at an impasse, they win.
If some Liberal Hong Kong kid comes in here and starts spouting off about the revolution of our times, are we all to defer and bow before them? Take their colonialist gripes seriously? Actually try to follow through with your logic here and see how it goes.
disengage