For the record, I’m not American nor live in the US, but I have a 19-year-old son who started attending the University of Chicago this year, studying economics. Just the tuition itself is $70k. My husband and I are lucky enough to be able to afford it - I still believe it’s an outrageous amount of money to attend college.

  • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I mean if you can afford a 70k/tuition you probably already know how economics works…

    Let me ask, why are you sending your child to that expensive college and not a local community college?

    • 18december@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because he wanted to go there & we can afford it. Plus it’s ranked as one of the best in the world for economics.

      • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You just answered your own question to why it’s so expensive. While a community college is still overpriced nowadays, it would probably be 1/10th of the cost. But if you’re willing to pay 70k a year then obviously someone is willing to take that much money from you.

      • aasatru@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As long as he doesn’t end up subscribing to the Chicago school of economics, but I have the impression that the University of Chicago has moved on and that even there it’s only subscribed to by the loonies these days.

        But whenever someone says they studied economy in Chicago I still get suspicious.

        Ironically, the influence of the Chicago school is probably why tuition is so expensive. Supply and demand, baby.

  • sifr@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Most community colleges are very affordable, if not free with financial aid. At many state universities, many students who are low income can qualify for free tuition.

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Because THOSE schools are expensive.

    - IN STATE VS OUT OF STATE -

    I went to a SUNY (State university) about 18 yrs ago and it was $3,000/semester. Today it’s $3,500/semester, so it didn’t go up by much. I stayed in state so it was lower for me. If you are not from the state it was $10,000/ semester (still on the lower end). Compare that to other people in other schools taking the same major as me. It was about 20,000/ semester for in state. We all ended up at the same jobs, I just didn’t carry the debt.

    For the US, staying in state helps a lot. Unfortunately I think the grand idea of moving away and dorming is pushed onto kids by the media. Another comparison, my wife, who also went to school in the same state as me, went to at a CUNY (City University) and it was $1,800/semester. It was a pretty great school and campus, but not a school you’d see in the movies or tv shows. We both chose to stay within our means and not put a burden on ourselves or our families. Today we are very successful with no debt.

    - SCHOOLS AS BRAND -

    One more thing that drives price, is that schools are also brands now, and you are paying for that. There is peer pressure to get into schools with better awareness. Same reason a kid would rather wear apparel from nike vs walmart. My niece just started college this year and was brainwashed into picking a school she couldn’t afford. They took out a loan and the school end up being horrible for her. She dropped out during the last semester and I was told all the money spent this year was a wash. She’s now going to end up going to the school her family originally recommended to her. There are plenty of schools in the states that are good and wont cost an arm and a leg.

    - CLASS FLUFF -

    For the sake of keeping kids in school they pack in so many additional unneeded electives. I think I had to take 11 within my first 2yrs and each of my classes was 3hrs long. Some days I would have 9hrs of class. That is not including the down time in between those clases, so I could be there around 11-12hrs on a single day. If you want to keep a part time job to help pay for college, then that may mean you have to take additional winter and summer classes. In a lot of places this isn’t covered during the regular months so you have to pay for more. This fluff is one of the ways they keep bachelors and masters programs to run for as long as they do and at the prices they do. Some of these schools do run expedited programs where if you have previous electives that transfer over, you can do your degree in half of the time.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Same reason everything in the US is expensive: we have largely unregulated, runaway capitalism which pervades every facet of life. Everything from housing to academia to health care is for profit – not only profit, but for obscene year-over-year increases in profit. Those at the top regularly make money hand over fist even selling basic necessities, and if they don’t continue taking more and more, they’re seen as failures and replaced by one who will.

    The cherry on top is that, for the most parts, the citizens no longer have any real power to change any of it.

    Around the same time that health care becomes affordable in the US (major hypothetical, of course), it probably means a wind change has occurred such that university costs would also be coming down. But it would be a systematic change.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    18 hours ago

    because america is the land of profit over humans. its just that simple.

    its ingrained in the entire country. if some rando at the top isnt profiting, it must be killed. its the problem with healthcare. its the problem with government (congress). its the reason we are entrenched in a 2-party hellscape.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And if the university of Chicago is that “Chicago school of economics” then this kid is going to come out the other end repesting close to what you said, but as a positive. :(

    • astanix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is that just America though? Are there other countries where profit isn’t king?

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m pretty confident the French wouldn’t stand for “rule by profit”

          • mommykink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            I’d put money down to Kickstart a documentary series where we fly American Redditors (and Lemm users) to Europe to film their reaction when they see that, yes, they still need to pay for items with money (and perform labor to get the money! 😱😱)

            • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Honestly, same. I’m so beyond tired of this “free” stuff Americans like to latch onto, not realising how much is stolen from the average Joe and Josephine before it becomes “free”.

            • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I mean, I’m aware that France has a capitalist economy. I mostly meant to say that Americans let capitalists step all over them in many ways that the French would riot over

              • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                The French aren’t the bastions maintaining rights they seem to be known as. Yes, they’ll throw a tantrum over political changes they don’t like, but late stange capitalism is still pretty bad and the average store is extremely bad for the standard competition that would favour the individual. Any mention of “I can get this cheaper at X.” is known to be followed up with “Cool. Fuck off over there then.” In as many words. Returning a faulty item will see the item getting a rigorous inspection to check that it’s still in pristine condition so it can be put back on the shelf to be sold to the next sucker (this is in the large supermarkets, not just the rare shady mom and pop stores). And electricity bills are double customer usage because the primary electricity supplier is owner by the state so they’re “legally” able to add 3 different taxes and their R&D bill to your bill. The telecoms companies do similar, partaking in that fun practice of adding nothing services to your plan you didn’t ask for and then “making things even” by raising your bill. And don’t get me started on the standard for customer support.

                Consumer rights are a joke in France and for all of these death-by-a-thousand-cuts capitalist agenda BS practices, the people of France do nothing.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        not that im aware of.

        america was founded on this crazy idea of ‘rugged individualism’. that ‘socialism’ is inherently evil. its every man for themselves, and anyone not rich is so because they arent doing it correctly.

        its also the reason why even a class full of dead kindergartners is ok as long as we get to keep our guns.

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is a private school so they don’t get much in the way of direct government funding. State-funded schools are considerably cheaper. I went to Wright State University in Ohio. Right now it’s about $13k/yr in tuition. This is still rather expensive on a global scale.

    Why do private schools charge that much? Because people (like you) will pay that much. What about the University of Chicago makes it so that you are willing pay for it? What do you or your son hope to get out of it that a school in your home country (I’m assuming Canada) can’t give him? To compare to Wright State, even for out-of-country students the tuition is less than half of Chicago’s tuition. Is the benefit of going to Chicago worth that much more? If it is, then that is exactly what you’re paying for.

  • booly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    All the schools rip off the rich to subsidize the middle class. You’re essentially subsidizing a bunch of students who are paying close to nothing.m, because you can afford $70k tuition.

    As another example, Harvard is free for anyone whose family makes less than $85k per year. Not just the tuition ($56k per year), but also the housing (worth $13k), food ($8k), health insurance ($1600), books, and a modest living stipend designed to cover things like a computer, commuting/travel, other expenses.

    And those who make up to $150k per year are capped at 10% of their income to pay for all that. In the end, the average cost of Harvard for the typical student is about $15,000 per year including housing and food.

    In other words, attending Harvard is cheaper than not attending school for anyone whose families make less than $150k, which is basically 75% of the nation. So if you’re actually paying full tuition, you’re probably pretty rich.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Only thing I’ll disagree with is they’re not ripping off the rich, because it doesn’t matter to the rich. They’re killing the middle class though, but that is the way it’s been and the way it will continue to be. You will either be rich (haha, jk) or poor, and that’s the end game.

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Because Reagan defunded public secondary education. And then instead of fixing that in the late 90s/early 00s, they made school loans non expungable and federally guaranteed, so schools didn’t need to keep their prices low and competitive anymore.

    It always goes back to Reagan…

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      This is the real answer I was looking for in the comments.

      Edit: it always goes back to Reagan.

      Why did unions lose their power? Reagan threatened striking ATC workers with firing if they didn’t return to work immediately. Suddenly striking workers could be fired.

      Why did weed become a life sentence drug? Reagan.

      Who demonized the poor on welfare, calling them welfare queens? Who is Ronald Reagan, Alex?

      Deregulated Wall street, banking and commerce sector, too.

      If there’s a glaring problem with the USA, there’s a very good chance it dates back to RR.

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Jesus Christ, so many people don’t know the real history of what happened while this is the real answer.

      To add on to Ronald “Fucking” Reagan defunding universities, he did it because as governor of California he absolutely hated the anti-Vietnam War protests happening on University of California campuses and thought a good way to limit attendance of ‘rabble rousing’ (re: poor) students was to take away their funding. Conservatives nationwide saw this and thought ‘that’s great, we should do that, too.’ and they did.

      Thanks Ronnie. You’re the unwanted microwaved dog shit that ruined America 40 years and your stink is still smelled in full force to this day. I didn’t believe in hell, but I hope they made a special one just for you.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Yep, this needs to be higher. Since student loans are guaranteed and pushed on all students, universities have been spending oodles of fucking money to justify higher tuition costs, which justifies bigger loans that can never be discharged. The banks win, the schools win, the student lose both academically and financially.

      Public universities could actually have stricter requirements on who could go to college, because if it’s already funded by taxes, you don’t want to be throwing money away on students who will fail out of the degree path they’re trying to pursue.

      Finally, two words: “Legacy Admissions”

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The government also ramped up the interest rates on student loans while universities increased the price faster than inflation, I paid around 3-4% in 2008, the lowest was around 2.7% in 2020, currently they are close to 7%. The whole thing should be covered by state and federal taxes we’re already paying to subsidize them, but it just keeps getting worse to squeeze every drop of blood from people who weren’t born with a trust fund.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      While true overall, University of Chicago is an elite private school with a hedge fund sized endowment with vast majority of students coming from families who pay 70k with two checks two weeks before each semester starts.

      This how they stay elite.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I just wasn’t sure if reagan did anything with HS budgets and how that connected with college prices. That guy was such a cancer on the country. Maybe we should just stop electing shitty actors altogether

  • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Because people are still paying it. That’s how you set the price of things. If people are paying 70k why would you sell it cheaper?

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If you can charge for something mandatory (minimum requirement for a decent job, house, healthcare) then you can set whatever price you want for it. You just need to push it to the limit of what people can finance to keep paying for over their whole lives.

      • explore_broaden@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Going to a private university certainly isn’t a requirement, and in-state tuition for public universities is much, much lower (but still too high).