Was just watching Jack Ryan Season 3 and seeing the display of force and their movements causes some interesting dissonance given what we know now.

  • Skua@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least as recently as 2005, diesel subs were the quieter option. There was that somewhat notorious story of the Swedish one that beat an American carrier group in a wargame because the Americans just couldn’t find it. I’m sure there have been developments in the equipment and methods since then - it was 18 years ago, after all - but it’s still notable enough that the Americans leased the sub from Sweden for a couple of years to practice against it.

    That said, the Swedish sub in question was packed with cutting-edge (at the time) stealth features. I suspect North Korea’s fleet is not.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol people hold on to that wargame so tightly as some Pinnacle of triumph over western armed forces, but the reality of the situation was that the sub commander in question went rogue and did something they weren’t supposed to do in order to win. Also at the end of the day it’s a fucking wargame, it’s practice, and nobody really cares how well you do in practice because it’s all about how you perform in the big game.

      Also as you noted the Americans did what we always do when situations like this happen, we game planned for never letting it happen again, this was an embarrassment for the US Navy, and you can bet it’s something they’re constantly working on never letting happen again, these are serious professionals who’s lives revolve around continuously planning ways to win against any situation while losing as few of their people as possible.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It sounds like the wargame did exactly what it was supposed to, people learned. All this talk of “embarrassment” is silly.

    • ramble81@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      as recently as 2005

      You do realize that’s almost 20 years ago. That’s like saying “well you realize in 1985…” Back in 2005.

      (The 2000s have been a blur for me time wise too)

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I’m not mistaken, that was a Gotland Class. Built in the early 90s, so over 30 years old.

        France has at least one diesel submarine that’s decades more modern.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the serious answer even when I was making a stupid joke/reference.

      As I replied to someone else, that is very interesting.

      My thoughts: It does seem extremely limited for its advantage though. The electric mode is basically a stealth option, but once they fire or do anything else then should be findable and that electric mode probably won’t last THAT long if they were being hunted actively.