• Dee@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    At least with this structure we can still defederate from them and go on about our merry way.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Until they take over and force a change that renders things back centralized into their hands.

      • Dee@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        That makes zero sense, that’s not how the fediverse works. Explain how they would take over completely independent and unconnected instances that are defederated from them.

        • MtnPoo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Implement new features that only work when you integrate with Meta, then cut them out of the picture if they don’t do what Meta says. The majority of users will stick with the instances that have the stickers and emojis that their friends have. Similar to what Google is doing with it’s browser and the Internet.

          • Dee@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            So we’d have the exact structure we have now. A centralized platform, or instance, for the people that don’t care and our current federated instances for the people that do care.

            This is all a big nothing burger. We’ll just continue to not use meta instances and platforms like we’re literally doing right now.

            • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Agreed. Truth be told, should the fediverse become mainstream, the masses will want the shiny bells and whistles and stick to the instances that support them. Those of us that could care less aren’t going to be swayed by them, and steer clear. Unless FB somehow manages to take over the codebase and force everyone into their shit, I think we’ll be fine.

          • dnzm@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            See also: Google with Gmail.

            Good luck running your own mail server these days, and getting your messages actually delivered to Gmail and Outlook/O365 mailboxes. It’s possible, but a hassle, and the rug can get pulled at any moment.

            • DeadGemini@waveform.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Just configure your SPF record properly and you should be fine having emails delivered to gmail. I work in tech support for a small software company and every single time a customer is having issues with our email server not delivering to GMail, it’s due to their SPF record being borked (which is on the customer’s IT department, not us)

        • hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          By having “the masses”, they can simply force things by not federating themselves. Email was already brought up and still federates but xmpp is a prime example where Facebook and google acquired a bunch of users and then walled off their access to federation. It all but killed xmpp as a tool in regular use outside of technically inclined circles.