Last week, a person with the Twitter handle @arizonasunblock from Tampa, Florida, noticed that Bradley, who has been on the high court since 2015, appeared to make major changes to her Wikipedia biography earlier this year.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      122
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “It’s so unfair that my own words can be written down for posterity!”

      Tell me she doesn’t know that just because you’ve edited a Wikipedia page, that the previous version still exists, and is likely to draw attention and discussion because of your edits.

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        2 years ago

        And is super easy to revert to the prior version too. It’s basically two clicks to make it happen. And then have an admin protect the page to only allow established editors so randos can’t do this with just an IP address again.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Just in case she happened to read my comment, I didn’t want to use the word “revert” in order to avoid confusion.

      • JDubbleu@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I love too that she mentioned, “REAL OPINIONS” as if those are more valid than the exact words she said.

        • antizero99@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It said “Actual Opinion” not “Real Opinions”.

          I’m pretty sure opinion doesn’t mean what you think it does. When a judge writes up an opinion it’s a bit stronger than me saying what I do or don’t like or how I feel about something. Same as between scientific theory and the other definition.

      • It’s an inaccurate epithet anyhow. Uncle Tom was overly nice to whites so as not to draw their wrath.

        In the end, the whites beat Uncle Tom to death when he refused to give the whereabouts of two runaway slaves.

        I don’t know what epithet you’d call someone who turned in the two slaves and lived to work the big house another day, but that’s what you should call Clarence.

        I used to call Clarence an Uncle Tom, but then I read the book.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            As someone who also read the book and was shocked that Tom wasn’t the minstrel show Tom that really earned the name: this weird effort to take back his name is self defeating and artificial.

            It says quite a lot that people also try to say “Maybe we should call them Uncle Ruckuses instead!”

            Mainly, it says they’re not clued in enough to realize the show/comic had two Uncle Toms. One had Uncle in his name, the other Tom.

            MacGruder wasn’t being very subtle, and yet everyone seems to have missed it anyways.

            Hell, if nothing else this whole weird idea is erasure of the minstrel shows. If you want to raise some actual awareness then feel free to separate Book Tom from Minstrel Tom, because we need to remember both.