• EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ok then.

        This just in- a person speaking for other people on what to be upset about

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are you referring to me, or the comic? (Earnest question, the internet makes things ambiguous sometimes)

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You. A rule I stick with is everyone on the internet is male until proven otherwise. However evidence points that you are male.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I didn’t tell anyone what to feel, I described the guy in the comic as an asshole (for acting like a dick) in a silly way as if I were a news reporter. I think he’s a dick.

          I don’t have to be a woman to say that it’s a dick move to be invalidating to someone explaining that they struggle with a certain experience. Or to hear them and then immediately make it into a contest. That has nothing to do with being a man or a woman, and everything to do with having basic social skills and empathy.

          And I’m “vaguely masculine” at best.

          • EABOD25@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Lol. I get what you mean by “vaguely masculine.”" My original argument can easily be put into the idea of individual persons going beyond the sexes. Speak for yourself as an individual. Let other people speak for themselves as individuals. Now, this is the part where you point out my hypocrisy, and to be honest, it’s deserved. However, you should let people who are going to accept it or reject it speak for themselves. We are supposed to live with the idea that OUR voices matter, so speaking for another person completely contradicts the idea of individuality

            • Cris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It seems odd to assume that the joke I posted was speaking for other people purely because I assumed the voice of a character, and then act like I’m somehow doing something wrong on the basis of that assumption

              You assumed I meant other people should be mad about something- I didn’t. You assumed I was a man- only in the loosest sense of the word. And then you criticised me for speaking on behalf of others by saying that I’m telling women what to be upset about? To be totally honest that sounds a hellofalot more speaking on other people’s behalf than what I wrote.

              I was being silly about the fact that he sounds like a dick. And I don’t agree with the notion that I’m deserving of criticism for your misplaced assumptions :(

              Regardless, take care. If I see you around lemmy again I hope our next interaction can be less hostile.

              • EABOD25@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Haha. Ok. Why do you carry a condom in your wallet? That’s pretty damning evidence that you’re male. And you weren’t being silly. You were commentating, and now you’re back-peddling to say it was fun. I’m not refuting that you want or are a feminist ally, but the whole point is to let the individual woman be offended. When your comment attempted to speak for the whole of women. It’s not necessarily your intention I’m arguing, but the action of saying that women in general should be offended at this comic. That is at least the perception you gave. And you can keep saying you were trying to be cheeky, but you yourself also said that context is difficult in these situations

                  • Cris@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Its literally a quarter and I say as much in the thread under the post he’s refrencing 🙃

                  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    No. That’s not the only reason. I’ll break it down:

                    So you have a folding, pocket wallet. Not necessarily a thing that shows gender, but the 2 condom imprints is something to take note of. On top of that, a trans ftm would still have little need for a condom. If they want to be tom-boyish, then they might carry a condom, but it also depends on their stage of transition if they choose to have a transition that way or not. A mtf trans might need a condom, but not stereotyped in carrying them in their fold wallet. A lesbian might carry a fold wallet, but why do they need a condom? A man (straight or gay) will have the most need for a condom in their fold wallet making them the most logical response to be a naturally born male carrying a condom. So sticking with the evidence of a condom in the wallet, I can begin to break everything else down.

                    The person I originally spoke with is young and had an appreciation for 80s tech (that explains their watch) carrying a hankerchief is weird, but I’ll assume that makes them modern hipsters. Carrying a pen with you everywhere? Well that just makes you a nerd and almost (potentially) deliberately going against the ebb and flow. Granted i don’t believe there’s anything wrong with that, but all signs point towards that the person I was originally speaking with is either a naturally born male that is a hipster and nerd (which tells me a lot about their idea of feminism) or a previously transitioned male (which, and this is IMO, you’ve lost your right to speak for the gender you transitioned from and should begin representing the gender you have or are transitioning to). I can keep going if you’re interested

                • Cris@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I literally don’t carry condoms in my wallet. You can see in that comment thread that its my quarters for getting a cart at Aldi. I am biologically male, but that doesn’t make me a man. I also sit down to pee and have boobs. My relationship is with gender is more than a little bit complicated. It also does not matter to the argument, men are allowed to criticize people’s behavior towards women, and it’d be dumb to argue they can’t.

                  And yes, telling what people mean over the internet is hard, which is why I don’t suggest that someone is doing something wrong when I don’t know what they mean, and instead ask, like I asked you.

                  And to be very clear, assigning my intentions or motives is also a dick thing to do; I did actually mean that he’s an asshole because he’s being dismissive of someone’s frustrations. Its not helped by the fact that he’s being dismissive of a uniquely afab experience and saying he has it worse as a man, but the way he engages with her is shitty entirely independent from the lens of gender. I think that if you hear someone’s frustrations and respond with “wow, my problem is way bigger than yours” you’re an emotionally and interpersonally incompetent jerk.

                  I literally did not say that women should be offended by this, that is an interpretation on your part, and going around calling people out based on your assumptions of them is a jerk thing to do.

                  And to reiterate, your callout is much more an example of speaking for others than “wow, that guy lacks any empathy and is being shitty to her”

                  This entire exchange has been entirely unnecessarily hostile. Have a nice day.

                  • EABOD25@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    No it’s not. if we’re talking about the fake circumstance of the comic as being a reality, then shouldn’t it be up to the woman to say that line of conversation or action is uncomfortable? We’re all individuals right?

                    And because one thing is offensive for one person, what makes it offensive for the next person. Let people say for themselves what offends them

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              subjectivity is the default. if you assume every statement on the internet is meant to be objective, you’ll go mad.