So my family has a few containers of unused blank dvds that are just lying around collecting dust. i know dvds are almost useless because of streaming, but can they still be used. Theses dvds can only be written to once and they only have like 3 gb of storage on them, can they still be used?, do they have a use?

  • yukichigai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you have a BluRay player most will read BluRay content burned to a DVD (a.k.a. BD5), and others will do AVCHD (a related but more simple format). You’ll be much more limited in terms of space obviously, but you can still put video on there at far better than DVD quality.

    Also if you’re like me and have a rotating set of games you install and uninstall, you can copy installation backups to a series of DVDs. Steam even has a built-in option to break installation backup files into 4.3 gig files specifically for burning to DVD.

      • yukichigai@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, there were even efforts to make factory-pressed “BD9” BluRay-on-DVD discs a mass produced cheaper alternative when BluRay was being launched, though it never actually went anywhere. They kept the format though just because it made sense to give people a way to make home media without having to spend an arm and a leg on blank discs.

        That said, the “requirement” for players to support BD5/BD9 has been dropped as of a few years ago, not that all of them did in the first place. Most players still support it, but you can’t count on it.

        • TrustingZebra
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s cool, I never heard of this! I remember following the HD-DVD format war at the time.

          • yukichigai@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Funnily enough the format war is why I know about it, since I decided to do a good long look into the pros and cons of each format, especially in terms of backwards compatibility and format support. HD DVD actually had an advantage in that regard: Blu-Ray only supports 480p and up, whereas HD DVD mandated support for damn near every resolution used by an existing disc-based format (VCD, SVCD) from 240p up. HD DVD players were also supposed to support content burned to CDs as well, meaning you could fit a fair chunk of lower resolution highly compressed HD DVD content on a CD and have it play in any HD DVD player, with subtitles and the like even.

            Not really that relevant now obviously, but at the time I was kinda bummed that HD DVD didn’t win the format war.

            • TrustingZebra
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought Blu-ray was technically superior? Due to having higher capacity and more features.

              I don’t see supporting 240p as a big advantage, and I doubt you could fit much HD content on a CD.

              • yukichigai@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                HD DVD was 15/30 gig versus Blu-Ray being 25/50 gig storage, yeah. For mainstream use that was far more important, so that played a large part in why it won, though a lot of it was also Sony making the PS3 Blu-Ray-based and giving adoption rates a huge boost as a result. In terms of actual video codec support though the two were identical: H.262 MPEG-2, H.264 AVC, and VC-1.

                As for how much content you could store on a CD, there were a lot of video resolutions supported in between 240p and HD, and H.264 can compress video quite a bit while still looking decent. For the die-hard video enthusiast, not much of a draw. For someone wanting to distribute stuff on the cheap, especially in poorer areas and “emerging markets” where SVCD players were (at the time) still commonly sold? Huge draw.

                EDIT: Also of minor note was that the video (but not audio) formats from previous CD-based formats were completely compatible with the HD DVD standard, meaning in a pinch someone could just take the existing video from an SVCD/CVD release and drop it into a HD DVD. Of course why one would do that is a valid question, but nonetheless the standard was set up to allow it. For whatever reason.