Year of the Linux Desktop Fediverse!

Side note, DAE find calling them “normies” kinda icky? It’s like straight outta 4chan

  • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Personally, I think there’s room in the Fediverse for an app with a “strong algorithm” provided it’s completely open ofc.

    My biggest issue with algorithms isn’t the fact they exist, but that they’re proprietary black boxes so no one truly knows how it’s being manipulated

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Remember when Musk took over Twitter and “open sourced” the algorithm, although it was impossible to reconstruct anything from what was given, and contained clear signs of being edited and incriminating details suggesting content categorization and prioritization?

      What I really want to see is Facebook’s algorithm, because it seems to just produce a neverending stream of alt-right bullshit.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      We should be able to select different fully open source algorithms from a drop down menu, and load custom ones from fediversealgorithmmenuwithdescriptions dot org, including “no algorithm”.

      I assume that’s like a billion hours of work, but, goals.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        When you sort your feed by hot vs top vs new, that’s already what you’re doing kinda.

        But the platform has to have the data to support the algorithm, so you can’t just “load in” whatever algorithm you want. Besides, that sounds like a security nightmare for the platform lol

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        16 hours ago

        “No algorithm” would load nothing at all. Everything is an “algorithm,” including listing all posts in chronological order.

        Wanting “no algorithm” is like wanting food with “no chemicals” in it and not realizing that carbs, fats, proteins, etc. are “chemicals.”

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          But when someone says they want no chemicals in their food, you know exactly what they mean. This is just being a bit pedantic, I think.

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Exactly. Every time I see someone post that “akshully, chronological order is also an algorithm” (which I see a lot), it makes me think of the old “what you are calling Linux is akshully GNU/Linux” thing. Please people, let that go.

            Because you know perfectly well that when we talk about “algorithms” we’re specifically referring to corporate social media manipulative algorithms designed to increase engagement, NOT a simple sort of posts by date or number of upvotes. mkay?

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 minutes ago

              It’s a “domain expert who interprets ‘algorithm’ as a technical term from their domain of expertise” vs “non-expert who interprets ‘algorithm’ with the meaning popularised by the Media in the last couple of years”.

              Both are right.