fossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · il y a 2 ansmoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1986
arrow-up1986imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · il y a 2 ansmessage-square88fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 2 ansThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-2il y a 2 ansNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.