erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1809 cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1809imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square53fedilink cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 day agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squareBorgDronelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was