erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1853 cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1853imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square53fedilink cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 year agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
minus-squareBorgDronelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.