erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 年前gender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1852 cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1852imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 年前message-square53fedilink cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 年前Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前but could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前That’s more or less what it historically was
minus-squareBorgDronelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.