The interaction did not start out at that point, it went there after you made it obvious you were not even going to watch the video of the event you talked about.
It’s being made clearer by you continually trying to rewrite the course of events.

By very purposely asking such a vague question, I’m openly inviting people answer with the information that they deem important to the context of this image.

You do not openly invite to a discussion about an event by hiding your intentions, that is by it’s very nature not an open discussion. Vague questions and answers also only lead to a bad discussion. A discussion which also requires interaction from you, which you have failed to do several times. If you wish to see an example of an open discussion, then go to the thread I’ve linked you.

And now you are trying to save face, but t his too you’re unable to. Instead you make it all the more clearer you are acting in bad faith.

As with all things, there are extremely polarized opinions about Tianamen Square, the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

So you did know what was going on? Why did you ask what happened then? Also of course you’re an enlightened centrist. The truth does not lie in the middle when the tale is one of lies and propaganda by the west, as many people have given you resources to see. You making this statement once again makes it clear you’re not engaging with the arguments given to you.