• konki
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago
    • that people always act in their own best interest (they fucking don’t)

    Totally agree

    • that people can actually choose not to buy the product

    This is actually pretty well deacrived by what’s called the price elasticity of demand in standard neoclassical models. For things like housing one might say that the demand is very inellastic: A change in price does not affect the quatity demanded.

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes exactly. This is why I find it funny when they use two different, yet contradictory reasons to justify the sin tax:

      • it prevents people from using it because they’ll choose not to use it (the thing they’re addicted to) if it gets too expensive; and,
      • the demand is very inelastic which means the government will make more revenue

      When really they’re primarily taxing the things poor people are addicted to.

      Idk, I’m generalizing, I’m just kind of pointing out how a lot of the supports capitalism rests on are weird little opaque excuses to convince the masses that exploitation is what’s best for us

      So many economists are stuck in a box of what our society has been, they can’t think past our current rules and regulations to what could be, because they think that the rules and trends they learn in school are the only possibility, or that profit must be king.