spujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 个月前rule :(i.imgur.comimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1707
arrow-up1707imagerule :(i.imgur.comspujb@lemmy.cafe to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 8 个月前message-square92fedilink
minus-squareCatoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·8 个月前This would only make sense if food stamps were the main driving factor in junk food sales (they’re not, everyone wants to eat garbage sometimes).
minus-squareearphone843@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 个月前I don’t think he government needs to subsidize eating garbage, though.
minus-squareCatoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·8 个月前Neither do I, but beef subsidies aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 个月前so tax junk food higher and subsidize healthy food directly? or do we only want poor people to eat healthy food?
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 个月前Gonna tax people to pay for the corn subsidies then tax people for eating the corn syrup
This would only make sense if food stamps were the main driving factor in junk food sales (they’re not, everyone wants to eat garbage sometimes).
I don’t think he government needs to subsidize eating garbage, though.
Neither do I, but beef subsidies aren’t going anywhere anytime soon.
so tax junk food higher and subsidize healthy food directly? or do we only want poor people to eat healthy food?
Why not both?
Gonna tax people to pay for the corn subsidies then tax people for eating the corn syrup