• xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The correct analogy would be someone else trying to prevent you from having a conversation with your friend.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People are unable see content from other people that their instance has defederated with. (Yes, you can have an account on multiple instances, but that kind of defeats the point of federation.)

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, the inconvenience of having to go from one openly available source of information to ANOTHER openly available source of information, is the same as an authority figure preventing someone from speaking their own opinions?

          If you say so. 🤷🏻‍♂️

          • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why should an instance get to choose what its users can read? That feels similar to a government deciding what their citizens can read.

            • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              But they aren’t. You can go see it.

              That’s like complaining about not being able to talk to your buddy across the street because you don’t want to walk over there. God damn city put this street here and it’s standing between me and my conversation!!!