Is this a real title? Jesus. In 5 years we’ll have ‘Totes mad bro, a study in lit lit and the whoop stats of medi writing stans’, ‘10 reasons peer reviewers hate this one weird trick’.
When we were young, the world was still on track. We’d never dare to be this audacious, to vandalize the language and soil the academic dignity and precision. The new generations are lost.
I’m not mad nor did I even assume it was real, which is why I asked. I don’t have the bandwidth to research shitposts, only to make stupid comments on Lemmy.
We’re living in Idiocracy, though, so I honestly would not be surprised.
Is this a real title? Jesus. In 5 years we’ll have ‘Totes mad bro, a study in lit lit and the whoop stats of medi writing stans’, ‘10 reasons peer reviewers hate this one weird trick’.
It’s a joke. She is telling this person not to gatekeep scholarly articles for some mundane reason
I would like to know what articles the first person is talking about before deciding if they’re out of line or not.
When we were young, the world was still on track. We’d never dare to be this audacious, to vandalize the language and soil the academic dignity and precision. The new generations are lost.
It’s a tweet, but please don’t let that stop you from getting mad about it.
Life already has enough drama without you manufacturing more.
I’m not mad nor did I even assume it was real, which is why I asked. I don’t have the bandwidth to research shitposts, only to make stupid comments on Lemmy.
We’re living in Idiocracy, though, so I honestly would not be surprised.
Its a satirical response to the first post, based on the timestamp.
Ah, I didn’t notice that until I saw your comment and went back to look at the original image again. Thanks 😁