• Lux18@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I mean, bikes are great for a lot of things and cities should definitely have the infrastructure to support their usage, but let’s not pretend that they can easily replace cars in every use case.
    Cars are faster, cover long distances which are just infeasible for bikes, are more comfortable, can be used in bad weather, and are needed for people with disabilities. Granted, all of those use cases should be covered by a good public transport system, but that’s exactly why cars are considered to be the symbol of freedom - not depending on the bus/train schedules, weather, distance etc.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      That freedom is an illusion. You’re constantly subject to other people in cars doing things, and what they do is often stupid as shit. You only have that freedom when out on the open road with few other cars around, and you’re probably specifically going out of your way to do that.