Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don’t get it.

    • redDEAD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Makes a post about messaging superiority by advocating for inferior app. Lol. Gotta read the room better buddy.

      • Kissaki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why are you taking such a confrontational approach?

        Original commenter and you give no information on what makes Signal better. Signal is outside of the topic scope anyway, but would be a fair extension of it. Instead you use an insulting tone and completely dismiss their approach.

        And this shit gets more up than downvotes. Makes it clear this platform has group-think toxicity issues too, moreso than promoting fair and good-intention discussion.

          • Kissaki@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            The tone makes a huge difference.

            OP tone is mainly confusion with an open question. They disclose their belief/understanding which they acknowledge either contradicts or puts into question the evident state of things they see.

            I don’t see how that’s confrontational similar to the commenter dismissing their whole approach as a definite statement without points you could argue. It’s a closed dismissal and in an insulting tone.

            What makes you think they are similar? Or to what degree?

            • wahming@monyet.cc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know about you, but the tone of the original question come across very dismissively to me. OP isn’t asking what they missed, why WhatsApp might be as good as Telegram. They’ve flat out declared the winner and are asking why nobody else is agreeing with them.

              • Kissaki@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I can see your point, and agree with it for the most part. But they’re still posting on Asklemmy implying it is a question or interest of reason. It also doesn’t dismiss a person directly/specifically, nor is the tone insulting.

              • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Seriously?

                Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don’t get it.

                vs

                … Lol. Gotta read the room better buddy.

                We’re not even in the same ballpark in terms of tone.

      • Frub@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        In regards to Whatsapp. If I were talking about signal vs telegram then this comment would be relevant but I’m not am i

        • danhakimi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean, Telegram is the worst of the bunch, but putting that aside, the point is that people aren’t comparing telegram and whatsapp, they’re comparing telegram, whatsapp, signal, matrix, sms, imessage, facebook messenger, instagram messenger, session, wire, wechat, the crypto ones, kik, and a dozen other chat clients you’ve never heard of. And most people are not actually making those comparisons, most people just use the one their friends use, or the one that their phone came with. Nobody, anywhere, is pretending there are only two options and picking one of them.