"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoControversial questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up11.7Kcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.7KimageControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square107fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.