• Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, because every single empoyeer is a thief. Capitalism bad, mkay. Fucking tankies.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe you should have gotton some qualification or had a better work ethic and you wouldn’t be stacking boxes at Amazon.

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t even know what his job is, I invented it. And I’m pretty sure all boxes at Amazon are stacked by robots, so it’s not even a real job.

            • Catchphrase@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Amazon is still very much fueled by human labor. “Warehouse Associate” would be the job title. It is definitely a “real job,” and the people grinding their joints into dust deserve so much more dignity (and compensation) than Amazon, and society as a whole, really, deigns to give them.

              • Kalash@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                They really do. I know the South Park episode.

                You guys should have like union or something, where a bunch of workers bands together to demand better conditions and so on.

    • Nora@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Imagine thinking capitalists deserve anything other than being kicked to the curb. Workers do everything, the sooner we control things the better.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s exactly what they said… can you refute that surplus value is extracted through exploitation of labour forces? No? Didn’t think so. Much easier to insult and deride, and pretend that was a meaningful or valuable argument, than to actually make one.