Zarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 1 年前GIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgexternal-linkmessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up1997cross-posted to: planetdyne@fed.dyne.orgopensource@lemmit.onlinegimp@lemmy.mlfreesoftware@lemmy.zipfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.worldopensource@programming.dev
arrow-up1997external-linkGIMP 3.0 Releasedwww.gimp.orgZarlin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Open Source@lemmy.ml · 1 年前message-square204fedilinkcross-posted to: planetdyne@fed.dyne.orgopensource@lemmit.onlinegimp@lemmy.mlfreesoftware@lemmy.zipfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.worldopensource@programming.dev
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前I couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic. Which would you choose based on their website? Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
minus-squareknexcar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前Yeah I admit I kind of prefer the Gimp site. Are you saying Lemmy isn’t an accurate random sample of normal people in reality?
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Yes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.
I couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic.
Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
Yeah I admit I kind of prefer the Gimp site. Are you saying Lemmy isn’t an accurate random sample of normal people in reality?
Yes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.