Plus, Rudy isn’t exactly a credible witness. He’s told so many lies, so many different versions of events, and he has proven he’s willing to say anything to save his own skin. The defense would tear him apart on the stand.
The only way he gets a deal is if he can provide hard evidence the prosecution doesn’t already have.
BUT … if he has hard evidence like documents, recordings, emails, txts, those might be worth something and will be harder for the defense to tear apart.
Yet still, I want to see Rudy behind bars so there’s that too.
Oh I agree and am hopeful that’s trye. And yet I don’t think it’s possible to have “too much” evidence against 45. To quote a wise woman, " …I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure."
100% this. He’d be a laughable witness against drumpf and all drumpf’s lawyers need to do is to cast reasonable bout in his testimony, There are a few obvious ones, like substance abuse, habitual lying, leaked tapes, financial embarrasment, etc. There’s also always a chance he’d make the whole process a clown show by sprouting off random ramblings and conspiracy theories on the stand. Drumpf’s attorneys could also easily push all the blame to Rudy by invoking the advice of counsel defence.
This. Trump is the main culprit and threat, so he’s priority.
But taking down a corrupt former mayor? That’s a feather in anyone’s cap too.
Plus, Rudy isn’t exactly a credible witness. He’s told so many lies, so many different versions of events, and he has proven he’s willing to say anything to save his own skin. The defense would tear him apart on the stand.
The only way he gets a deal is if he can provide hard evidence the prosecution doesn’t already have.
Totally agree.
BUT … if he has hard evidence like documents, recordings, emails, txts, those might be worth something and will be harder for the defense to tear apart.
Yet still, I want to see Rudy behind bars so there’s that too.
I expect the case is entirely airtight. They indicted a former president, and you don’t do that if there’s a chance you lose.
Oh I agree and am hopeful that’s trye. And yet I don’t think it’s possible to have “too much” evidence against 45. To quote a wise woman, " …I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure."
100% this. He’d be a laughable witness against drumpf and all drumpf’s lawyers need to do is to cast reasonable bout in his testimony, There are a few obvious ones, like substance abuse, habitual lying, leaked tapes, financial embarrasment, etc. There’s also always a chance he’d make the whole process a clown show by sprouting off random ramblings and conspiracy theories on the stand. Drumpf’s attorneys could also easily push all the blame to Rudy by invoking the advice of counsel defence.
Glad to see “drumpf” is still out there in the wilds