schizoidman@lemm.ee to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 24 days agoGermany's interior minister-to-be sceptical of banning far-right AfDdpa-international.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up168
arrow-up168external-linkGermany's interior minister-to-be sceptical of banning far-right AfDdpa-international.comschizoidman@lemm.ee to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareseeigel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoThe analogy with the dog doesn’t work. The AfD is not there to protect anything.
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoDon’t be obtuse, it was made in reference to your comment about “controlled opposition”.
minus-squareseeigel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 days agoI understood that. But who cares about the neighbor feeding the dog if the dog is not there to protect?
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 days agoStill obtuse.
minus-squareseeigel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 days agoLast thing I can say is that feeding the dog references the financing of the AfD by Russia. Please tell me, how is this a problem if the AfD is not part of the government?
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 days agoSomething for you to ponder I suppose, sorry I couldn’t be more help
minus-squareseeigel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 days agoI think I got it. ‘they’ means AfD in your comment while the article is about the politician suggesting that the CxU has to outgovern. they are not interested in "out governing"anyone, While the minister is saying “I don’t believe that we can just ban the AfD. Instead we need to outgovern them.” Sorry, I mistook your comment. I thought you were wondering why the CxU doesn’t take the AfD serious. I am not obstuse but dense.
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 days agoI am normally more willing to explain myself. I was in a bit of a mood at the time and dealing with genuine trolls elsewhere. Thanks for understanding
minus-squareseeigel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 days agoWell, you could say what you wanted to say in other words.
The analogy with the dog doesn’t work. The AfD is not there to protect anything.
Don’t be obtuse, it was made in reference to your comment about “controlled opposition”.
I understood that. But who cares about the neighbor feeding the dog if the dog is not there to protect?
Still obtuse.
Last thing I can say is that feeding the dog references the financing of the AfD by Russia. Please tell me, how is this a problem if the AfD is not part of the government?
Something for you to ponder I suppose, sorry I couldn’t be more help
I think I got it. ‘they’ means AfD in your comment while the article is about the politician suggesting that the CxU has to outgovern.
While the minister is saying
Sorry, I mistook your comment. I thought you were wondering why the CxU doesn’t take the AfD serious.
I am not obstuse but dense.
I am normally more willing to explain myself. I was in a bit of a mood at the time and dealing with genuine trolls elsewhere. Thanks for understanding
Well, you could say what you wanted to say in other words.