• Winged_Hussar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m not sure they’re really comparable.

    That phones 2nd display was: 1040x160 pixels

    The main display was: 2560x1440

    ~4%

    The 2nd display also couldn’t display another app, but was limited to:

    • Quick Tools (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth)
    • App shortcuts (specific apps)
    • Recent apps
    • Quick contacts
    • Music controls
    • Signature (By default your name)
    • Upcoming plans

    And didn’t allow inline replies or ‘normal’ notification features (at that time it was Android 7).

    The one perk that phone did have was that the 2nd display could be on while the main screen was off.

    • mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      While you are right that the V20’s implementation was limited use, it added an ease of interaction with notifications and controls you mentioned.

      I’d argue a 10% screen share implementation is limited use as well though. The article even spends a lot of time talking about how you can’t see much on that sliver of screen, it’s just an easy way to swap between apps - which we can already do by double tapping the square button.