• Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Cool, my galaxy s4 with some mods just let me resize to whatever ratio in 2014. And the stupid thing is… most apps support this right now. Google is just being stupid

    • Winged_Hussar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I’m not sure they’re really comparable.

      That phones 2nd display was: 1040x160 pixels

      The main display was: 2560x1440

      ~4%

      The 2nd display also couldn’t display another app, but was limited to:

      • Quick Tools (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth)
      • App shortcuts (specific apps)
      • Recent apps
      • Quick contacts
      • Music controls
      • Signature (By default your name)
      • Upcoming plans

      And didn’t allow inline replies or ‘normal’ notification features (at that time it was Android 7).

      The one perk that phone did have was that the 2nd display could be on while the main screen was off.

      • mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        While you are right that the V20’s implementation was limited use, it added an ease of interaction with notifications and controls you mentioned.

        I’d argue a 10% screen share implementation is limited use as well though. The article even spends a lot of time talking about how you can’t see much on that sliver of screen, it’s just an easy way to swap between apps - which we can already do by double tapping the square button.

      • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Screen aspect ratios are typically represented at their lowest whole number, no? That’s why we have 4:3 instead of 8:6 etc so I thought the same applied here

        • William@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This isn’t a screen aspect ratio. It’s a ratio of 1 portion of the screen to another portion of the screen.

          It’s short for 90%:10%. 1 app uses 90% of the screen and another uses 10% of the screen.

          It’s not comparing the length of 1 edge of the screen to a perpendicular edge of the screen.

          • ikidd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s a ratio of 1 portion of the screen to another 9 portion(s) of the screen.

            FTFY

  • cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You can just swipe back and forth, whats the issue they are trying to solve?

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Sometimes you need to work in 2 apps simultaneously. Switching is not the same at all.

      Android, unlike iOS, actually runs apps simultaneously.

      Using a pass code for an app/website that won’t allow copy/paste, for example. I don’t use it a lot, but occasionally it can be useful to have maps and media player going together. Or 2 mapping apps.

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        True. Splitscreen is also the only option I know to watch videos and commenting on lemmy. At least for apps that don’t support floating windows.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Isn’t it adjustable already? Or is that only in the versions I use (Lineage forks).

    It would be nice to be able to set a default other than 50:50

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The new trick is that when you tap on the bottom 10%, it’ll make that app take up 90%, and the app you were just in will be downsized to the remaining 10%. As for why this is considered better than pressing the multitasking button twice, I have no idea. I’ve honestly never enjoyed the split screen feature on my phone, but I multitask a lot.

      Engineers need to stay busy I guess, even if every feature a phone needs has been implemented.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Honestly kind of cool. I don’t use split screen much but when I do it’s usually for maps and music because having the ability to swipe to the next song is often more reliable that my steering wheel controls. Easier to use in rental cars in my experience too. Not sure I need it to be that extreme for my use case though.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Obviously, the screen could then be mostly text actually, say 30:70 instead of the proposed 90:10.